threads / discuss / 38033

Re: How safe are signed git tags? Only as safe as SHA-1 or somehow safer?

Subject: Re: How safe are signed git tags? Only as safe as SHA-1 or somehow safer?

## tl;dr

One message between Nov 24, 2014 and Nov 24, 2014.

replies: 0people: 1as markdown or json

bancfc@openmailbox.org· Nov 24, 2014, 00:52 UTC · lore

Hi, I wanted to chime in on the topic of SHA1 weaknesses and breaks. The problem is idea that SHA1 breaks are theoretical and will only be relevant in a decade or two.

I think its a telling sign when even companies like Google [1] and Microsoft [2] who collaborate with spy agencies are moving away from SHA1 in verifying browser certs and the estimates by reputable cryptographers already put us in the realm of feasible breaks at this time, with the bar going lower with every passing year [3]. In three years common cyber criminals will be able to crack it using moderate sized computer clusters or by renting some AWS cycles.

Please reconsider the urgency of moving away from SHA1 for security functions in Git.

References:

[1] http://thenextweb.com/google/2014/09/05/google-will-start-sunsetting-sha-1-cryptographic-hash-algorithm-chrome-month-finish-q1-2015/

[2] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/11/microsoft_retir.html (Schneier on Security: Microsoft Retiring SHA-1 in 2016)

[3] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/10/when_will_we_se.html (When Will We See Collisions for SHA-1?)

← back to recent threads