Hello Git, I was wondering if a patch that adds the tag information (something like what "git log --decorate" produces) to the "git status" would be welcome? All the best, Bartek
-- 本日も小田急線をご利用いただきまして、どうもありがとうございました。
Hello Git, I was wondering if a patch that adds the tag information (something like what "git log --decorate" produces) to the "git status" would be welcome? All the best, Bartek
-- 本日も小田急線をご利用いただきまして、どうもありがとうございました。
Re: Make "git status" show if on tag
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:54:25PM +0200, bpuzon wrote:
> I was wondering if a patch that adds the tag information (something > like what "git log --decorate" produces) to the "git status" would be > welcome?
Do you mean when you are on a branch that also happens to point at the same commit found at a tag? Or do you mean when you have detached your HEAD at a tag (e.g., by doing "git checkout v1.0").
In the latter case, git v1.8.3 and later will print the tag name already.
If the former, I don't have a strong opinion (it is not something I would find useful, but I can see how others might). If it were not intrusive, like:
# On branch master (v1.0)
I don't think anybody would complain. It does involve enumerating all of the refs to calculate it, which might be noticeable. OTOH, "status" is not exactly a lightweight operation already, since it has to refresh the whole index.
You might also consider just showing "git describe" output, which will show a tag if you are on it, but also show your distance to the nearest tag otherwise. It is more expensive to calculate, though.
-Peff
Re: Make "git status" show if on tag
Hi Bartek,
bpuzon wrote:
> I was wondering if a patch that adds the tag information (something > like what "git log --decorate" produces) to the "git status" would > be welcome?
It would slow down "git status" a little. I haven't thought carefully about whether that cost is worth it --- it's hard to know without a rough patch to try it out. ;-)
So the patch would be welcome, as a way to find out.
Thanks, Jonathan