Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf-lib: add test_perf_cleanup target
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> When one performance test fails, the testing is aborted and the cleanup
>>> commands are not executed anymore, leaving the trash directory in the
>>> failed state.
>>
>> Ah, that I overlooked. In that case, the comments in my previous
>> message do not apply.
>
> Having said that, it was unclear to me why we would want a new
> test_perf_cleanup added.
>
> The name is misleading (does it define only clean-up actions?) to
> say the least, and one way of fixing it would be to call it
> test_perf_with_cleanup.
It defines any actions you want to happen after each round of tests that should not be timed. Usually that would mean any action that resets a modified repository to its original state. I'm not really sure about the name, but test_perf_with_cleanup seems good to me.
Show 5 quoted lines
> I wondered why this clean-up section cannot be an optional parameter
> to test_perf, but that would not fly well because we won't know if
> 3-arg form is with one prerequisite and no clean-up, or no prereq
> with a clean-up, so perhaps adding a new function may be the best
> you could do.
Yeah, that was my first thought too, but as you explained that's not possible. Just thinking out loud, we could drop the prerequisite check for performance tests, as no performance tests currently use it. Future performance tests may use it though and it would be inconsistent with the rest of the test-suite.
Show 9 quoted lines
> But in the longer term, I think we would be better off to allow two
> styles (one traditional, another modern) and add new features only
> to the "modern" (aka "more easily extensible") form:
>
> test_perf [PREREQ] BODY
> test_perf [--prereq PREREQ] [--cleanup CLEANUP] ... BODY
>
> perhaps like this (this is without --cleanup but it should be
> obvious how to add a support for it to the command line parser).
I think this makes most sense. The cleanup part would only be needed for the perf tests, but the flexibility of this wouldn't hurt. The cleanup would then look something like this:
Show changes to 2 files +21 −0
t/perf/perf-lib.sh, t/test-lib-functions.sh
diff --git a/t/perf/perf-lib.sh b/t/perf/perf-lib.sh
index b2a277b..4dfdd28 100644
--- a/t/perf/perf-lib.sh
+++ b/t/perf/perf-lib.sh
@@ -176,6 +176,21 @@ test_perf () {
test_failure_ "$@"
break
fi
+ if ! test -z "$cleanup_action"; then
+ say >&3 "cleaning up: $cleanup_action"
+ if test_run_ "$cleanup_action"
+ then
+ if test -z "$verbose"; then
+ echo -n " c$i"
+ else
+ echo "* cleaning up run $i/$GIT_PERF_REPEAT_COUNT:"
+ fi
+ else
+ test -z $verbose && echo
+ test_failure_ "$@"
+ break
+ fi
+ fi
done
if test -z "$verbose"; then
echo " ok"
diff --git a/t/test-lib-functions.sh b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
index 473b21d..4bad14f 100644
--- a/t/test-lib-functions.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
@@ -360,6 +360,12 @@ test_expect_parse () {
test_prereq=$2
shift
;;
+ --cleanup)
+ test $# -gt 1 ||
+ error "bug in the test script: --cleanup needs a parameter"
+ cleanup_action=$2
+ shift
+ ;;
--)
shift
break
I'll try to send an updated patch series, probably over the weekend with
this suggestions included (It's time to go to bed now).
> The patch to t0008 is primarily to adjust for test labels that begin
> with double-dashes that will be mistaken as a new-style option, but
> it is unnecessarily big because it uses random custom shell functions
> to hide the real calls to underlying test_expect_success X-<.
>
>
> t/test-lib-functions.sh | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> t/perf/perf-lib.sh | 17 +++++-------
> t/t0008-ignores.sh | 43 +++++++++++++++--------------
> 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/test-lib-functions.sh b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> index a7e9aac..10202dc 100644
> --- a/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> @@ -342,20 +342,65 @@ test_declared_prereq () {
> return 1
> }
>
> +test_expect_parse () {
> + whoami=$1
> + shift
> + test_expect_new_style=
> + while case $# in 0) false ;; esac
> + do
> + case "$1" in
> + --prereq)
> + test $# -gt 1 ||
> + error "bug in the test script: --prereq needs a parameter"
> + test_prereq=$2
> + shift
> + ;;
> + --)
> + shift
> + break
> + ;;
> + --*)
> + error "bug in the test script: unknown option '$1'"
> + ;;
> + *)
> + break
> + ;;
> + esac
> + test_expect_new_style=yes
> + shift
> + done
> +
> + # Traditional "test_expect_what [PREREQ] BODY"
> + if test -z "$test_expect_new_style"
> + then
> + test "$#" = 3 && { test_prereq=$1; shift; } || test_prereq=
> + fi
> +
> + if test $# != 2
> + then
> + if test -z "$test_expect_new_style"
> + then
> + error "bug in the test script: not 2 or 3 parameters to $whoami"
> + else
> + error "bug in the test script: not 2 parameters to $whoami"
> + fi
> + fi
> + test_label=$1 test_body=$2
> +
> + export test_prereq
> +}
> +
> test_expect_failure () {
> test_start_
> - test "$#" = 3 && { test_prereq=$1; shift; } || test_prereq=
> - test "$#" = 2 ||
> - error "bug in the test script: not 2 or 3 parameters to test-expect-failure"
> - export test_prereq
> + test_expect_parse test_expect_failure "$@"
> if ! test_skip "$@"
> then
> - say >&3 "checking known breakage: $2"
> - if test_run_ "$2" expecting_failure
> + say >&3 "checking known breakage: $test_body"
> + if test_run_ "$test_body" expecting_failure
> then
> - test_known_broken_ok_ "$1"
> + test_known_broken_ok_ "$test_label"
> else
> - test_known_broken_failure_ "$1"
> + test_known_broken_failure_ "$test_label"
> fi
> fi
> test_finish_
> @@ -363,16 +408,13 @@ test_expect_failure () {
>
> test_expect_success () {
> test_start_
> - test "$#" = 3 && { test_prereq=$1; shift; } || test_prereq=
> - test "$#" = 2 ||
> - error "bug in the test script: not 2 or 3 parameters to test-expect-success"
> - export test_prereq
> + test_expect_parse test_expect_success "$@"
> if ! test_skip "$@"
> then
> - say >&3 "expecting success: $2"
> - if test_run_ "$2"
> + say >&3 "expecting success: $test_body"
> + if test_run_ "$test_body"
> then
> - test_ok_ "$1"
> + test_ok_ "$test_label"
> else
> test_failure_ "$@"
> fi
> diff --git a/t/perf/perf-lib.sh b/t/perf/perf-lib.sh
> index f4eecaa..6477d38 100644
> --- a/t/perf/perf-lib.sh
> +++ b/t/perf/perf-lib.sh
> @@ -151,23 +151,20 @@ exit $ret' >&3 2>&4
>
> test_perf () {
> test_start_
> - test "$#" = 3 && { test_prereq=$1; shift; } || test_prereq=
> - test "$#" = 2 ||
> - error "bug in the test script: not 2 or 3 parameters to test-expect-success"
> - export test_prereq
> + test_expect_parse test_perf "$@"
> if ! test_skip "$@"
> then
> base=$(basename "$0" .sh)
> echo "$test_count" >>"$perf_results_dir"/$base.subtests
> - echo "$1" >"$perf_results_dir"/$base.$test_count.descr
> + echo "$test_label" >"$perf_results_dir"/$base.$test_count.descr
> if test -z "$verbose"; then
> - printf "%s" "perf $test_count - $1:"
> + printf "%s" "perf $test_count - $test_label:"
> else
> - echo "perf $test_count - $1:"
> + echo "perf $test_count - $test_label:"
> fi
> for i in $(test_seq 1 $GIT_PERF_REPEAT_COUNT); do
> - say >&3 "running: $2"
> - if test_run_perf_ "$2"
> + say >&3 "running: $test_body"
> + if test_run_perf_ "$test_body"
> then
> if test -z "$verbose"; then
> printf " %s" "$i"
> @@ -183,7 +180,7 @@ test_perf () {
> if test -z "$verbose"; then
> echo " ok"
> else
> - test_ok_ "$1"
> + test_ok_ "$test_label"
> fi
> base="$perf_results_dir"/"$perf_results_prefix$(basename "$0" .sh)"."$test_count"
> "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/perf/min_time.perl test_time.* >"$base".times
>
>
> diff --git a/t/t0008-ignores.sh b/t/t0008-ignores.sh
> index 96f40fe..795de61 100755
> --- a/t/t0008-ignores.sh
> +++ b/t/t0008-ignores.sh
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ test_expect_success_multi () {
> expect_verbose=$( echo "$expect_all" | grep -v '^:: ' )
> expect=$( echo "$expect_verbose" | sed -e 's/.* //' )
>
> - test_expect_success $prereq "$testname" '
> + test_expect_success ${prereq:+--prereq $prereq} -- "$testname" '
> expect "$expect" &&
> eval "$code"
> '
> @@ -116,10 +116,11 @@ test_expect_success_multi () {
> then
> for quiet_opt in '-q' '--quiet'
> do
> - test_expect_success $prereq "$testname${quiet_opt:+ with $quiet_opt}" "
> - expect '' &&
> - $code
> - "
> + test_expect_success ${prereq:+--prereq $prereq} -- \
> + "$testname${quiet_opt:+ with $quiet_opt}" '
> + expect "" &&
> + eval "$code"
> + '
> done
> quiet_opt=
> fi
> @@ -140,7 +141,9 @@ test_expect_success_multi () {
> $code
> "
> opts="$verbose_opt$non_matching_opt"
> - test_expect_success $prereq "$testname${opts:+ with $opts}" "$test_code"
> +
> + test_expect_success ${prereq:+--prereq $prereq} -- \
> + "$testname${opts:+ with $opts}" "$test_code"
> done
> done
> verbose_opt=
> @@ -225,7 +228,7 @@ test_expect_success '-q with multiple args' '
> stderr_contains "fatal: --quiet is only valid with a single pathname"
> '
>
> -test_expect_success '--quiet with multiple args' '
> +test_expect_success -- '--quiet with multiple args' '
> expect "" &&
> test_check_ignore "--quiet one two" 128 &&
> stderr_contains "fatal: --quiet is only valid with a single pathname"
> @@ -235,7 +238,7 @@ for verbose_opt in '-v' '--verbose'
> do
> for quiet_opt in '-q' '--quiet'
> do
> - test_expect_success "$quiet_opt $verbose_opt" "
> + test_expect_success -- "$quiet_opt $verbose_opt" "
> expect '' &&
> test_check_ignore '$quiet_opt $verbose_opt foo' 128 &&
> stderr_contains 'fatal: cannot have both --quiet and --verbose'
> @@ -243,7 +246,7 @@ do
> done
> done
>
> -test_expect_success '--quiet with multiple args' '
> +test_expect_success -- '--quiet with multiple args' '
> expect "" &&
> test_check_ignore "--quiet one two" 128 &&
> stderr_contains "fatal: --quiet is only valid with a single pathname"
> @@ -559,34 +562,34 @@ sed -e 's/^"//' -e 's/\\//' -e 's/"$//' expected-default | \
> sed -e 's/ "/ /' -e 's/\\//' -e 's/"$//' expected-verbose | \
> tr ":\t\n" "\0" >expected-verbose0
>
> -test_expect_success '--stdin' '
> +test_expect_success -- '--stdin' '
> expect_from_stdin <expected-default &&
> test_check_ignore "--stdin" <stdin
> '
>
> -test_expect_success '--stdin -q' '
> +test_expect_success -- '--stdin -q' '
> expect "" &&
> test_check_ignore "-q --stdin" <stdin
> '
>
> -test_expect_success '--stdin -v' '
> +test_expect_success -- '--stdin -v' '
> expect_from_stdin <expected-verbose &&
> test_check_ignore "-v --stdin" <stdin
> '
>
> for opts in '--stdin -z' '-z --stdin'
> do
> - test_expect_success "$opts" "
> + test_expect_success -- "$opts" "
> expect_from_stdin <expected-default0 &&
> test_check_ignore '$opts' <stdin0
> "
>
> - test_expect_success "$opts -q" "
> + test_expect_success -- "$opts -q" "
> expect "" &&
> test_check_ignore '-q $opts' <stdin0
> "
>
> - test_expect_success "$opts -v" "
> + test_expect_success -- "$opts -v" "
> expect_from_stdin <expected-verbose0 &&
> test_check_ignore '-v $opts' <stdin0
> "
> @@ -645,7 +648,7 @@ sed -e 's/^"//' -e 's/\\//' -e 's/"$//' expected-default | \
> sed -e 's/ "/ /' -e 's/\\//' -e 's/"$//' expected-verbose | \
> tr ":\t\n" "\0" >expected-verbose0
>
> -test_expect_success '--stdin from subdirectory' '
> +test_expect_success -- '--stdin from subdirectory' '
> expect_from_stdin <expected-default &&
> (
> cd a &&
> @@ -653,7 +656,7 @@ test_expect_success '--stdin from subdirectory' '
> )
> '
>
> -test_expect_success '--stdin from subdirectory with -v' '
> +test_expect_success -- '--stdin from subdirectory with -v' '
> expect_from_stdin <expected-verbose &&
> (
> cd a &&
> @@ -661,7 +664,7 @@ test_expect_success '--stdin from subdirectory with -v' '
> )
> '
>
> -test_expect_success '--stdin from subdirectory with -v -n' '
> +test_expect_success -- '--stdin from subdirectory with -v -n' '
> expect_from_stdin <expected-all &&
> (
> cd a &&
> @@ -671,7 +674,7 @@ test_expect_success '--stdin from subdirectory with -v -n' '
>
> for opts in '--stdin -z' '-z --stdin'
> do
> - test_expect_success "$opts from subdirectory" '
> + test_expect_success -- "$opts from subdirectory" '
> expect_from_stdin <expected-default0 &&
> (
> cd a &&
> @@ -679,7 +682,7 @@ do
> )
> '
>
> - test_expect_success "$opts from subdirectory with -v" '
> + test_expect_success -- "$opts from subdirectory with -v" '
> expect_from_stdin <expected-verbose0 &&
> (
> cd a &&
Thomas Gummerer