Re: [PATCH] sequencer: trivial cleanup
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 05:53:19PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > sequencer.c | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> > index 351548f..8ed9f98 100644
> > --- a/sequencer.c
> > +++ b/sequencer.c
> > @@ -466,10 +466,7 @@ static int allow_empty(struct replay_opts *opts, struct commit *commit)
> > empty_commit = is_original_commit_empty(commit);
> > if (empty_commit < 0)
> > return empty_commit;
> > - if (!empty_commit)
> > - return 0;
> > - else
> > - return 1;
> > + return empty_commit ? 0 : 1;
> > }
>
> Isn't it the other way around? Moreover, 'return !!empty_commit;'
> would be simpler.
Considering the possible return values from is_original_commit_empty(), I think all this could be written as
return is_original_commit_empty(commit);
Best, Gábor