Pat ThoytsOn Dec 15, 2011 8:01 PM, "Martin von Zweigbergk" < martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, David Aguilar wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Pat Thoyts > >> <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> > Launching 'gitk -- .' or 'gitk -- ..\t' restricts the display to
files
> >> > under the given directory but the file list is left empty. This is
because
> >> > the path_filter function fails to match the filenames which are
relative
> >> > to the working tree to the filter which is filessytem relative. > >> > This solves the problem by making both names fully qualified
filesystem
Show 11 quoted lines
> >> > paths before performing the comparison. > > How is this related to my patches from April? See > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/170853. It's > clearly not the same problem, but will the patches conflict? Will some > of mine be unnecessary? > > > Thanks for reminding me that I did not yet apply and push. Did so now. > > What do you mean by this? Push to where? > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk.git is still down.
This is about msysgit as I also posted this there.
Show 6 quoted lines
> Paul and Junio, the patches I sent in April are still not in git.git, > are they? Can we use another repo until the kernel.org one is up? More > than eight months to get a patch (or eight) merged is way too long, > IMO. > > Martin
I'm not sure how this might relate to your patches. I've got a version merged on top of the last version of the gitk report that I have which includes those and it seems fine. As stated I did this work against git-core as the gitk repository continues to be unavailable. However as I have a pretty current snapshot I have pushed this to github to provide some visibility of things I know are not present within git-core. See http://github.com/patthoyts/gitk.git On Dec 15, 2011 8:01 PM, "Martin von Zweigbergk" < martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> wrote: