threads / discuss / 23985

patchAbout [PATCH] gitweb: Create a perl module to store gitweb configuration

Subject: About [PATCH] gitweb: Create a perl module to store gitweb configuration

## tl;dr

6 messages between Jun 2, 2010 and Jun 3, 2010. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 5people: 2as markdown or json

Jakub Narebski· Jun 2, 2010, 20:29 UTC · lore

This comment is about commit 9526ab8 (gitweb: Create a perl module to store gitweb configuration, 2010-06-01) on 'master' branch of repository shown at http://repo.or.cz/w/git/gsoc2010-gitweb.git

> From 9526ab8a12c8d4d875d08a6201c7eca963c7d9aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 02:36:48 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Create a perl module to store gitweb configuration
I would probably say
  Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Config module to store gitweb configuration
or even
  Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Config module
so that _name_ of this module is in commit subject (summary).
> 
> Create a perl module in path gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
> to store all the configuration variables of the gitweb.perl
> script and change the scope of those variables in main script.
A bit overlong sentence, isn't it?  Perhaps
  Create a Gitweb::Config module in 'gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm'
  to store all the configuration variables of the gitweb.perl
  script.
(Assuming that I can convince you to avoid fully qualified names).
> 
> Move subroutine evaluate_gitweb_config() into the same module
> so that the statement 'do GITWEB_CONFIG' or 'do GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM'
> works similiar to the working before the split.
s/similiar/similar/

I agree that you should list which subroutines you do move to Gitweb::Config package, though this list would be probably longer that the evaluate_gitweb_config() alone... or perhaps not.

But I do not understand the statement about "do $GITWEB_CONFIG" etc. here. Did you wanted to say that setting $GITWEB_CONFIG etc. was moved out of evaluate_gitweb_config(), and is left in gitweb.perl?

> 
> Change Makefile accordingly to install the Perl Module.
I would say:
  Update gitweb/Makefile to install gitweb modules alongside gitweb.
Or something like that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
> ---
When sending this patch to git mailing list you should mention that it
is based on
  gitweb: Put all per-connection code in run() subroutine
and perhaps also on
  gitweb: Add support for FastCGI, using CGI::Fast
unless those two commits made it into 'master' till then.
Show 15 quoted lines
>  gitweb/Makefile             |    6 +
>  gitweb/gitweb.perl          |  692 ++++++++++---------------------------------
>  gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm |  389 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 558 insertions(+), 529 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
> 
> diff --git a/gitweb/Makefile b/gitweb/Makefile
> index d2584fe..45e176e 100644
> --- a/gitweb/Makefile
> +++ b/gitweb/Makefile
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ PERL_PATH  ?= /usr/bin/perl
>  bindir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(bindir))#'
>  gitwebdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitwebdir))#'
>  gitwebstaticdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitwebdir)/static)#'
> +gitweblibdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitwebdir)/lib)#'

I think it would be good idea to have 'gitweblibdir' as a separate variable, alongside 'gitwebdir', and which would default to

   gitweblibdir = $(gitwebdir)/lib

to make it possible to install gitweb modules not alongside gitweb, but somewhere else, for example together with other Perl modules.

Then you would have:
  +gitweblibdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitweblibdir))#'

But I think this change can be left for a separate commit. It is not something terribly important, something blocking accepting the patch.

BTW. did you start working on the 'write' part yet, at least on the conceptual (specification / architecture) level?

Show 19 quoted lines
>  SHELL_PATH_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(SHELL_PATH))#'
>  PERL_PATH_SQ  = $(subst ','\'',$(PERL_PATH))#'
>  DESTDIR_SQ    = $(subst ','\'',$(DESTDIR))#'
> @@ -110,6 +111,9 @@ endif
>  
>  GITWEB_FILES += static/git-logo.png static/git-favicon.png
>  
> +# Files: gitweb/lib/Gitweb
> +GITWEB_LIB_GITWEB += lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
> +
>  GITWEB_REPLACE = \
>  	-e 's|++GIT_VERSION++|$(GIT_VERSION)|g' \
>  	-e 's|++GIT_BINDIR++|$(bindir)|g' \
> @@ -150,6 +154,8 @@ install: all
>  	$(INSTALL) -m 755 $(GITWEB_PROGRAMS) '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitwebdir_SQ)'
>  	$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitwebstaticdir_SQ)'
>  	$(INSTALL) -m 644 $(GITWEB_FILES) '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitwebstaticdir_SQ)'
> +	$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitweblibdir_SQ)/Gitweb'
> +	$(INSTALL) -m 644 $(GITWEB_LIB_GITWEB) '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitweblibdir_SQ)/Gitweb'

Uhhh... this would probably get more complicated *if* there would be more complicated hierarchy, e.g. if there would be Gitweb module in lib/Gitweb.pm. I guess that is the reason behind $(GITWEB_LIB_GITWEB) name, isn't it?

Show 14 quoted lines
>  
>  ### Cleaning rules
>  
> diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> index 673e7a3..98a85f4 100755
> --- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> +++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> @@ -16,19 +16,22 @@ use Encode;
>  use Fcntl ':mode';
>  use File::Find qw();
>  use File::Basename qw(basename);
> +use File::Spec;
>  binmode STDOUT, ':utf8';
> 
The fragment below was slightly edited to make it more clear.
Show 5 quoted lines
> -our $t0;
> -if (eval { require Time::HiRes; 1; }) {
> -	$t0 = [Time::HiRes::gettimeofday()];
> -}
> -our $number_of_git_cmds = 0;

Theoretically neither $t0 nor $number_of_git_cmds belong to Gitweb::Config, as those are about runtime timing, not about gitweb configuration.

But perhaps for the time being you can put it in Gitweb::Config.
Show 7 quoted lines
> +# __DIR__ is taken from Dir::Self __DIR__ fragment
> +sub __DIR__ () {
> +	File::Spec->rel2abs(join '', (File::Spec->splitpath(__FILE__))[0, 1]);
> +}
> +use lib __DIR__ . "/lib";
> +
> +use Gitweb::Config;
O.K.

It's a pity that Dir::Self is not a core Perl module since Perl 5.8, and that FindBin which is in core since 5.4 has its quirks and nowadays is not recommended to use...

Show 7 quoted lines
>  
>  BEGIN {
>  	CGI->compile() if $ENV{'MOD_PERL'};
>  }
>  
> -our $version = "++GIT_VERSION++";
> +$Gitweb::Config::version = "++GIT_VERSION++";

If '$version' was exported by Gitweb::Config this change would be not necessary.

I would remove all such changes from discussion of this patch.
Show 5 quoted lines
> -# URI and label (title) of GIT logo link
> -#our $logo_url = "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/";
> -#our $logo_label = "git documentation";
> -our $logo_url = "http://git-scm.com/";
> -our $logo_label = "git homepage";

All right, those variables that do not need initialization using build-time substitutions are put together with their description in Gitweb::Config.

I would remove all such changes from discussion of this patch.
>  sub gitweb_get_feature {
>  	my ($name) = @_;
[...]

I wonder if this subroutine, and its companion 'gitweb_check_feature' should be not moved to Gitweb::Config module.

> -our ($GITWEB_CONFIG, $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM);
> +our $GITWEB_CONFIG = $ENV{'GITWEB_CONFIG'} || "++GITWEB_CONFIG++";
> +our $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM = $ENV{'GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM'} || "++GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM++";

This would probably look like this, because $GITWEB_CONFIG must be set in gitweb.perl -> gitweb.cgi, and not in Gitweb::Config, where evaluate_gitweb_config() would be.

Show 12 quoted lines
> -sub evaluate_gitweb_config {
> -	our $GITWEB_CONFIG = $ENV{'GITWEB_CONFIG'} || "++GITWEB_CONFIG++";
> -	our $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM = $ENV{'GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM'} || "++GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM++";
> -	# die if there are errors parsing config file
> -	if (-e $GITWEB_CONFIG) {
> -		do $GITWEB_CONFIG;
> -		die $@ if $@;
> -	} elsif (-e $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM) {
> -		do $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM;
> -		die $@ if $@;
> -	}
> -}
Right, this got moved to Gitweb::Config.
Show 6 quoted lines
> -our ($action, $project, $file_name, $file_parent, $hash, $hash_parent, $hash_base,
> -     $hash_parent_base, @extra_options, $page, $searchtype, $search_use_regexp,
> -     $searchtext, $search_regexp);
>  sub evaluate_and_validate_params {
>  	our $action = $input_params{'action'};
>  	if (defined $action) {

Hmmm... it looks like those got also moved to Gitweb::Config, even if those variables have nothing to do with gitweb configuration, but are about request, and therefore belong to Gitweb::Request. Thus this commit should probably not touch this.

Show 9 quoted lines
> @@ -963,10 +602,8 @@ sub evaluate_and_validate_params {
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -# path to the current git repository
> -our $git_dir;
>  sub evaluate_git_dir {
>  	our $git_dir = "$projectroot/$project" if $project;
>  }

Same with $git_dir -- it is request dependent, not configuration dependent.

[very large cut, not necessary with exporting variables]
Show 20 quoted lines
> diff --git a/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm b/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e1bd06f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
> @@ -0,0 +1,389 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/perl
> +#
> +# Gitweb::Config -- gitweb configuration package
> +#
> +# This program is licensed under the GPLv2
> +
> +package Gitweb::Config;
> +
> +use strict;
> +
> +BEGIN {
> +	use Exporter();
> +
> +	@Gitweb::Config::ISA = qw(Exporter);	
                                            ^^^^
Trailing whitespace.  Didn't git warn you about this?
> +	@Gitweb::Config::EXPORT = qw();
> +}
Why BEGIN block?  Why 'use Exporter();' and not 'use Exporter;'?
Why not
   use Exporter;
   use base 'Exporter';
or even
   use Exporter qw(import);

(we can use the last version, because gitweb requires high enough Perl version itself, so that this form can be used).

Show 6 quoted lines
> +
> +our $t0;
> +if (eval { require Time::HiRes; 1; }) {
> +	$t0 = [Time::HiRes::gettimeofday()];
> +}
> +our $number_of_git_cmds = 0;

This does not strictly speaking belong in Gitweb::Config, and probably neither in Gitweb::Request, but Gitweb::request is a better place for it.

Never-mind, we can move it later.
> +

Here it would be good place for comment that those are variables that are affected by build-time configuration, and therefore their initialization is put in gitweb.perl (together with comments with their description).

Show 12 quoted lines
> +our ($GIT, $version, $git_version);
> +our ($projectroot, $project_maxdepth, $projects_list, @git_base_url_list);
> +our ($export_ok, $strict_export);
> +our ($home_link_str, $site_name, $site_header, $site_footer, $home_text);
> +our (@stylesheets, $stylesheet, $logo, $favicon, $javascript);
> +our ($GITWEB_CONFIG, $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM);
> +
> +# URI and label (title) of GIT logo link
> +#our $logo_url = "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/";
> +#our $logo_label = "git documentation";
> +our $logo_url = "http://git-scm.com/";
> +our $logo_label = "git homepage";
[cut]

Nothing especially interesting here. 'git blame -C -C' should detect code movement.

Show 11 quoted lines
> +
> +sub evaluate_gitweb_config {
> +	# die if there are errors parsing config file
> +	if (-e $GITWEB_CONFIG) {
> +		do $GITWEB_CONFIG;
> +		die $@ if $@;
> +	} elsif (-e $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM) {
> +		do $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM;
> +		die $@ if $@;
> +	}
> +}

Here the question is if this would affect interpretation of $GITWEB_CONFIG etc. if it is a relative path. Perhaps nothing will change, because paths are relative to the directory the script is run, not relative to where module resides.

Not that is matter much either way, as at most it would require stating in gitweb/README that one should use absolute pathnames.

Note that tests use absolute pathname, so passing test does not answer this.

> +
> +1;
O.K.
Good work!
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
Pavan Kumar Sunkara· Jun 3, 2010, 05:07 UTC · re: Jakub Narebski · lore

Re: About [PATCH] gitweb: Create a perl module to store gitweb configuration

2010/6/3 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
Show 31 quoted lines
> This comment is about commit 9526ab8 (gitweb: Create a perl module to
> store gitweb configuration, 2010-06-01) on 'master' branch of
> repository shown at http://repo.or.cz/w/git/gsoc2010-gitweb.git
>
>> From 9526ab8a12c8d4d875d08a6201c7eca963c7d9aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 02:36:48 +0530
>> Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Create a perl module to store gitweb configuration
>
> I would probably say
>
>  Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Config module to store gitweb configuration
>
> or even
>
>  Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Config module
>
> so that _name_ of this module is in commit subject (summary).
>
>>
>> Create a perl module in path gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
>> to store all the configuration variables of the gitweb.perl
>> script and change the scope of those variables in main script.
>
> A bit overlong sentence, isn't it?  Perhaps
>
>  Create a Gitweb::Config module in 'gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm'
>  to store all the configuration variables of the gitweb.perl
>  script.
>
> (Assuming that I can convince you to avoid fully qualified names).
Ok.
Show 10 quoted lines
>>
>> Move subroutine evaluate_gitweb_config() into the same module
>> so that the statement 'do GITWEB_CONFIG' or 'do GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM'
>> works similiar to the working before the split.
>
> s/similiar/similar/
>
> I agree that you should list which subroutines you do move to
> Gitweb::Config package, though this list would be probably longer that
> the evaluate_gitweb_config() alone... or perhaps not.
Ok.
> But I do not understand the statement about "do $GITWEB_CONFIG"
> etc. here.  Did you wanted to say that setting $GITWEB_CONFIG etc. was
> moved out of evaluate_gitweb_config(), and is left in gitweb.perl?

Nope. I actually wanted to say that any of the previous gitweb_config.perl will work without the problems of scoping.

Show 8 quoted lines
>>
>> Change Makefile accordingly to install the Perl Module.
>
> I would say:
>
>  Update gitweb/Makefile to install gitweb modules alongside gitweb.
>
> Or something like that.
Ok.
Show 10 quoted lines
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
> When sending this patch to git mailing list you should mention that it
> is based on
>  gitweb: Put all per-connection code in run() subroutine
> and perhaps also on
>  gitweb: Add support for FastCGI, using CGI::Fast
> unless those two commits made it into 'master' till then.
Ok.
Show 27 quoted lines
>>  gitweb/Makefile             |    6 +
>>  gitweb/gitweb.perl          |  692 ++++++++++---------------------------------
>>  gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm |  389 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 558 insertions(+), 529 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
>>
>> diff --git a/gitweb/Makefile b/gitweb/Makefile
>> index d2584fe..45e176e 100644
>> --- a/gitweb/Makefile
>> +++ b/gitweb/Makefile
>> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ PERL_PATH  ?= /usr/bin/perl
>>  bindir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(bindir))#'
>>  gitwebdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitwebdir))#'
>>  gitwebstaticdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitwebdir)/static)#'
>> +gitweblibdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitwebdir)/lib)#'
>
> I think it would be good idea to have 'gitweblibdir' as a separate
> variable, alongside 'gitwebdir', and which would default to
>
>   gitweblibdir = $(gitwebdir)/lib
>
> to make it possible to install gitweb modules not alongside gitweb,
> but somewhere else, for example together with other Perl modules.
>
> Then you would have:
>
>  +gitweblibdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitweblibdir))#'
It's great.
Show 6 quoted lines
> But I think this change can be left for a separate commit.  It is not
> something terribly important, something blocking accepting the patch.
>
>
> BTW. did you start working on the 'write' part yet, at least on the
> conceptual (specification / architecture) level?

Yeah. I have already written some of it in python before I applied for gsoc. So, I have a good idea over it on the conceptual level.

Show 24 quoted lines
>>  SHELL_PATH_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(SHELL_PATH))#'
>>  PERL_PATH_SQ  = $(subst ','\'',$(PERL_PATH))#'
>>  DESTDIR_SQ    = $(subst ','\'',$(DESTDIR))#'
>> @@ -110,6 +111,9 @@ endif
>>
>>  GITWEB_FILES += static/git-logo.png static/git-favicon.png
>>
>> +# Files: gitweb/lib/Gitweb
>> +GITWEB_LIB_GITWEB += lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
>> +
>>  GITWEB_REPLACE = \
>>       -e 's|++GIT_VERSION++|$(GIT_VERSION)|g' \
>>       -e 's|++GIT_BINDIR++|$(bindir)|g' \
>> @@ -150,6 +154,8 @@ install: all
>>       $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(GITWEB_PROGRAMS) '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitwebdir_SQ)'
>>       $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitwebstaticdir_SQ)'
>>       $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(GITWEB_FILES) '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitwebstaticdir_SQ)'
>> +     $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitweblibdir_SQ)/Gitweb'
>> +     $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(GITWEB_LIB_GITWEB) '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(gitweblibdir_SQ)/Gitweb'
>
> Uhhh... this would probably get more complicated *if* there would be
> more complicated hierarchy, e.g. if there would be Gitweb module in
> lib/Gitweb.pm.  I guess that is the reason behind $(GITWEB_LIB_GITWEB)
> name, isn't it?
Yes. Exactly.
Show 28 quoted lines
>>
>>  ### Cleaning rules
>>
>> diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
>> index 673e7a3..98a85f4 100755
>> --- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
>> +++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
>> @@ -16,19 +16,22 @@ use Encode;
>>  use Fcntl ':mode';
>>  use File::Find qw();
>>  use File::Basename qw(basename);
>> +use File::Spec;
>>  binmode STDOUT, ':utf8';
>>
>
> The fragment below was slightly edited to make it more clear.
>
>> -our $t0;
>> -if (eval { require Time::HiRes; 1; }) {
>> -     $t0 = [Time::HiRes::gettimeofday()];
>> -}
>> -our $number_of_git_cmds = 0;
>
> Theoretically neither $t0 nor $number_of_git_cmds belong to
> Gitweb::Config, as those are about runtime timing, not about gitweb
> configuration.
>
> But perhaps for the time being you can put it in Gitweb::Config.
Ok.
Show 24 quoted lines
>> +# __DIR__ is taken from Dir::Self __DIR__ fragment
>> +sub __DIR__ () {
>> +     File::Spec->rel2abs(join '', (File::Spec->splitpath(__FILE__))[0, 1]);
>> +}
>> +use lib __DIR__ . "/lib";
>> +
>> +use Gitweb::Config;
>
> O.K.
>
> It's a pity that Dir::Self is not a core Perl module since Perl 5.8,
> and that FindBin which is in core since 5.4 has its quirks and
> nowadays is not recommended to use...
>
>>
>>  BEGIN {
>>       CGI->compile() if $ENV{'MOD_PERL'};
>>  }
>>
>> -our $version = "++GIT_VERSION++";
>> +$Gitweb::Config::version = "++GIT_VERSION++";
>
> If '$version' was exported by Gitweb::Config this change would be not
> necessary.
Yeah. I am currently removing them.
Show 20 quoted lines
> I would remove all such changes from discussion of this patch.
>
>> -# URI and label (title) of GIT logo link
>> -#our $logo_url = "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/";
>> -#our $logo_label = "git documentation";
>> -our $logo_url = "http://git-scm.com/";
>> -our $logo_label = "git homepage";
>
> All right, those variables that do not need initialization using
> build-time substitutions are put together with their description in
> Gitweb::Config.
>
> I would remove all such changes from discussion of this patch.
>
>>  sub gitweb_get_feature {
>>       my ($name) = @_;
> [...]
>
> I wonder if this subroutine, and its companion 'gitweb_check_feature'
> should be not moved to Gitweb::Config module.
Ok. Will do it.
Show 34 quoted lines
>> -our ($GITWEB_CONFIG, $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM);
>> +our $GITWEB_CONFIG = $ENV{'GITWEB_CONFIG'} || "++GITWEB_CONFIG++";
>> +our $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM = $ENV{'GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM'} || "++GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM++";
>
> This would probably look like this, because $GITWEB_CONFIG must be set
> in gitweb.perl -> gitweb.cgi, and not in Gitweb::Config, where
> evaluate_gitweb_config() would be.
>
>> -sub evaluate_gitweb_config {
>> -     our $GITWEB_CONFIG = $ENV{'GITWEB_CONFIG'} || "++GITWEB_CONFIG++";
>> -     our $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM = $ENV{'GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM'} || "++GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM++";
>> -     # die if there are errors parsing config file
>> -     if (-e $GITWEB_CONFIG) {
>> -             do $GITWEB_CONFIG;
>> -             die $@ if $@;
>> -     } elsif (-e $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM) {
>> -             do $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM;
>> -             die $@ if $@;
>> -     }
>> -}
>
> Right, this got moved to Gitweb::Config.
>
>> -our ($action, $project, $file_name, $file_parent, $hash, $hash_parent, $hash_base,
>> -     $hash_parent_base, @extra_options, $page, $searchtype, $search_use_regexp,
>> -     $searchtext, $search_regexp);
>>  sub evaluate_and_validate_params {
>>       our $action = $input_params{'action'};
>>       if (defined $action) {
>
> Hmmm... it looks like those got also moved to Gitweb::Config, even if
> those variables have nothing to do with gitweb configuration, but are
> about request, and therefore belong to Gitweb::Request.  Thus this
> commit should probably not touch this.

Sorry. That was a mistake. I probably ammended the commit while working on Gitweb:Request Module.

Show 55 quoted lines
>> @@ -963,10 +602,8 @@ sub evaluate_and_validate_params {
>>       }
>>  }
>>
>> -# path to the current git repository
>> -our $git_dir;
>>  sub evaluate_git_dir {
>>       our $git_dir = "$projectroot/$project" if $project;
>>  }
>
> Same with $git_dir -- it is request dependent, not configuration
> dependent.
>
> [very large cut, not necessary with exporting variables]
>
>> diff --git a/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm b/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e1bd06f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
>> @@ -0,0 +1,389 @@
>> +#!/usr/bin/perl
>> +#
>> +# Gitweb::Config -- gitweb configuration package
>> +#
>> +# This program is licensed under the GPLv2
>> +
>> +package Gitweb::Config;
>> +
>> +use strict;
>> +
>> +BEGIN {
>> +     use Exporter();
>> +
>> +     @Gitweb::Config::ISA = qw(Exporter);
>                                            ^^^^
>
> Trailing whitespace.  Didn't git warn you about this?
>
>> +     @Gitweb::Config::EXPORT = qw();
>> +}
>
> Why BEGIN block?  Why 'use Exporter();' and not 'use Exporter;'?
>
> Why not
>
>   use Exporter;
>   use base 'Exporter';
>
> or even
>
>   use Exporter qw(import);
>
> (we can use the last version, because gitweb requires high enough Perl
> version itself, so that this form can be used).
Ok. Sure.
Show 19 quoted lines
>> +
>> +our $t0;
>> +if (eval { require Time::HiRes; 1; }) {
>> +     $t0 = [Time::HiRes::gettimeofday()];
>> +}
>> +our $number_of_git_cmds = 0;
>
> This does not strictly speaking belong in Gitweb::Config, and probably
> neither in Gitweb::Request, but Gitweb::request is a better place for
> it.
>
> Never-mind, we can move it later.
>
>> +
>
> Here it would be good place for comment that those are variables that
> are affected by build-time configuration, and therefore their
> initialization is put in gitweb.perl (together with comments with
> their description).
Ok.
Show 40 quoted lines
>> +our ($GIT, $version, $git_version);
>> +our ($projectroot, $project_maxdepth, $projects_list, @git_base_url_list);
>> +our ($export_ok, $strict_export);
>> +our ($home_link_str, $site_name, $site_header, $site_footer, $home_text);
>> +our (@stylesheets, $stylesheet, $logo, $favicon, $javascript);
>> +our ($GITWEB_CONFIG, $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM);
>> +
>> +# URI and label (title) of GIT logo link
>> +#our $logo_url = "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/";
>> +#our $logo_label = "git documentation";
>> +our $logo_url = "http://git-scm.com/";
>> +our $logo_label = "git homepage";
>
> [cut]
>
> Nothing especially interesting here.  'git blame -C -C' should detect
> code movement.
>
>> +
>> +sub evaluate_gitweb_config {
>> +     # die if there are errors parsing config file
>> +     if (-e $GITWEB_CONFIG) {
>> +             do $GITWEB_CONFIG;
>> +             die $@ if $@;
>> +     } elsif (-e $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM) {
>> +             do $GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM;
>> +             die $@ if $@;
>> +     }
>> +}
>
> Here the question is if this would affect interpretation of
> $GITWEB_CONFIG etc. if it is a relative path.  Perhaps nothing will
> change, because paths are relative to the directory the script is run,
> not relative to where module resides.
>
> Not that is matter much either way, as at most it would require
> stating in gitweb/README that one should use absolute pathnames.
>
> Note that tests use absolute pathname, so passing test does not answer
> this.
Will check it out and update README accoringly.
Show 10 quoted lines
>> +
>> +1;
>
> O.K.
>
> Good work!
> --
> Jakub Narebski
> Poland
>

Thanks, Pavan.

Jakub Narebski· Jun 3, 2010, 10:23 UTC · re: Pavan Kumar Sunkara · lore

Re: About [PATCH] gitweb: Create a perl module to store gitweb configuration

On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Pavan Kumar Sunkarawrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> 2010/6/3 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
>>
>> This comment is about commit 9526ab8 (gitweb: Create a perl module to
>> store gitweb configuration, 2010-06-01) on 'master' branch of
>> repository shown at http://repo.or.cz/w/git/gsoc2010-gitweb.git
Show 26 quoted lines
>>> diff --git a/gitweb/Makefile b/gitweb/Makefile
>>> index d2584fe..45e176e 100644
>>> --- a/gitweb/Makefile
>>> +++ b/gitweb/Makefile
>>> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ PERL_PATH  ?= /usr/bin/perl
>>>  bindir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(bindir))#'
>>>  gitwebdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitwebdir))#'
>>>  gitwebstaticdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitwebdir)/static)#'
>>> +gitweblibdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitwebdir)/lib)#'
>>
>> I think it would be good idea to have 'gitweblibdir' as a separate
>> variable, alongside 'gitwebdir', and which would default to
>>
>>   gitweblibdir = $(gitwebdir)/lib
>>
>> to make it possible to install gitweb modules not alongside gitweb,
>> but somewhere else, for example together with other Perl modules.
>>
>> Then you would have:
>>
>>  +gitweblibdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(gitweblibdir))#'
> 
> It's great.
> 
>> But I think this change can be left for a separate commit.  It is not
>> something terribly important, something blocking accepting the patch.

Actually to really be able to put gitweb packages somewhere else, gitweb.perl should *probably* contain

  use lib '++GITWEBLIBDIR++';

Otherwise 'gitweblibdir' would have to be either left default to install packages alingside gitweb.cgi script, or be directory that is in PERL5LIB for web server.

So let's leave it for a later commit.
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
Jakub Narebski· Jun 3, 2010, 08:55 UTC · re: Jakub Narebski · lore

About [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Create a perl module to handle gitweb cgi params and vars

This comment is about commit a6d54b3 (gitweb: Create a perl module to handle gitweb cgi params and vars, 2010-06-02) on 'master' branch of repository shown at http://repo.or.cz/w/git/gsoc2010-gitweb.git

> From a6d54b39cee3d8d39c7ffd993b23e7477d4b0eeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:09:51 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Create a perl module to handle gitweb cgi params and vars
I would probably say
  Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Request module to handle gitweb cgi params and vars
or even
  Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Request module
so that _name_ of this module is in commit subject (summary).
Show 7 quoted lines
> 
> Create a perl module in path gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Request.pm
> to store and handle all the cgi params and global variables
> regarding the gitweb.perl script and change the scope of those
> variables in the main script.
> 
> Change Makefile accordingly to install the Perl Module.
Similar comment like for the previous patch.

You would probably want to list which subroutines were moved to Gitweb::Request, I think.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
> ---

This patch would be probably based on 'next', and this should be mentioned in this area, in comment about patch.

Show 15 quoted lines
>  gitweb/Makefile              |    1 +
>  gitweb/gitweb.perl           | 1245 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Request.pm |   58 ++
>  3 files changed, 662 insertions(+), 642 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Request.pm
> 
> diff --git a/gitweb/Makefile b/gitweb/Makefile
> index 45e176e..15646b2 100644
> --- a/gitweb/Makefile
> +++ b/gitweb/Makefile
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ GITWEB_FILES += static/git-logo.png static/git-favicon.png
>  
>  # Files: gitweb/lib/Gitweb
>  GITWEB_LIB_GITWEB += lib/Gitweb/Config.pm
> +GITWEB_LIB_GITWEB += lib/Gitweb/Request.pm
Nice.
Show 9 quoted lines
> diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> index 98a85f4..263af48 100755
> --- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> +++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ sub __DIR__ () {
>  use lib __DIR__ . "/lib";
>  
>  use Gitweb::Config;
> +use Gitweb::Request;
Nice.
> @@ -33,42 +34,6 @@ BEGIN {
>  
>  our $version = "++GIT_VERSION++";

The above context line changed wrt. original patch, to follow the idea about exporting variables by default in Gitweb::Config, and not using fully qualified variable names.

>  
> -our ($my_url, $my_uri, $base_url, $path_info, $home_link);
> -sub evaluate_uri {
> -	our $cgi;

I guess that $cgi is left for gitweb.perl, isn't it, because it depends on FastCGI vs CGI? [reads later part]. I guess not, only $CGI is left in gitweb.perl.

[...]
> -}
O.K. these variables, and evaluate_uri() is moved to Gitweb::Request.
[removed changes related to introducing fully qualified variable
 names; it would make patch smaller without those]
Show 5 quoted lines
> @@ -347,13 +312,11 @@ our %allowed_options = (
>  # build an array of parameters that can be multi-valued, but since for the time
>  # being it's only this one, we just single it out
>  sub evaluate_query_params {
> -	our $cgi;
[...]
>  }
> @@ -361,12 +324,12 @@ sub evaluate_query_params {
>  # now read PATH_INFO and update the parameter list for missing parameters
>  sub evaluate_path_info {
[...]
>  }
>  sub evaluate_and_validate_params {
[...]
>  }

Shouldn't evaluate_query_params(), evaluate_path_info(), and the subroutine that ties them together evaluate_and_validate_params() be in Gitweb::Request too?

>  
>  sub evaluate_git_dir {
[....]
>  }
Ditto with evaluate_git_dir()?

BTW. as I said in comment to previous patch, vriables such as $project should be put in Gitweb::Request in my opinion, not in Gitweb::Config. Perhaps they are, but it is not obvious from this patch.

Show 6 quoted lines
>  
>  our (@snapshot_fmts, $git_avatar);
> @@ -643,32 +605,32 @@ set_message(\&handle_errors_html);
>  
>  # dispatch
>  sub dispatch {
[...]
>  }
>  
>  sub run_request {

Those two subroutines should not, I guess, be put in Gitweb::Request. They would be in catch-all Gitweb module, I guess, or perhaps in the later post-GSoC future in Gitweb::Dispatch or something.

Show 7 quoted lines
> @@ -689,7 +651,6 @@ sub run_request {
>  our $is_last_request = sub { 1 };
>  our ($pre_dispatch_hook, $post_dispatch_hook, $pre_listen_hook);
>  our $CGI = 'CGI';
> -our $cgi;
>  sub evaluate_argv {
>  	return unless (@ARGV);
Ah, so $CGI is left in gitweb.perl, $cgi is moved to Gitweb::Request.
  
[cut more than half of patch, which sould not be needed with exporting
 variables and not using fully qualified variable names]
Show 11 quoted lines
> diff --git a/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Request.pm b/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Request.pm
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..91cc492
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Request.pm
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/perl
> +#
> +# Gitweb::Request -- gitweb request(cgi) package
> +#
> +# This program is licensed under the GPLv2

I don't remember what is git policy on copyright statements, and on GPLv2 vs GPLv2+...

Show 11 quoted lines
> +
> +package Gitweb::Request;
> +
> +use strict;
> +
> +BEGIN {
> +	use Exporter();
> +
> +	@Gitweb::Request::ISA = qw(Exporter);	
> +	@Gitweb::Request::EXPORT = qw();
> +}
Same comment as for previous patch.
   use Exporter qw(import);
   our @EXPORT = qw($cgi, $my_url, $my_uri, $base_url, ...);

BTW with exporting variables you can easily see here that Gitweb::Request does not use any variable from Gitweb::Config.

Show 7 quoted lines
> +
> +our ($cgi, $my_url, $my_uri, $base_url, $path_info, $home_link);
> +our ($action, $project, $file_name, $file_parent, $hash, $hash_parent, $hash_base,
> +     $hash_parent_base, @extra_options, $page, $git_dir);
> +our ($searchtype, $search_use_regexp, $searchtext, $search_regexp);
> +
> +sub evaluate_uri {
[...]
> +}

Straightforward code movement. But see comment above on which subroutines I feel should be also put in Gitweb::Request.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
Pavan Kumar Sunkara· Jun 3, 2010, 09:52 UTC · re: Jakub Narebski · lore

Re: About [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Create a perl module to handle gitweb cgi params and vars

Show 10 quoted lines
> Shouldn't evaluate_query_params(), evaluate_path_info(), and the
> subroutine that ties them together evaluate_and_validate_params() be
> in Gitweb::Request too?
>
>>
>>  sub evaluate_git_dir {
> [....]
>>  }
>
> Ditto with evaluate_git_dir()?

Well, evaluate_and_validate_params() and evaluate_path_info() contains calls to subroutines which are not yet moved into any package. So, what do you want to in such a case ?

Show 18 quoted lines
> BTW. as I said in comment to previous patch, vriables such as $project
> should be put in Gitweb::Request in my opinion, not in Gitweb::Config.
> Perhaps they are, but it is not obvious from this patch.
>
>>
>>  our (@snapshot_fmts, $git_avatar);
>> @@ -643,32 +605,32 @@ set_message(\&handle_errors_html);
>>
>>  # dispatch
>>  sub dispatch {
> [...]
>>  }
>>
>>  sub run_request {
>
> Those two subroutines should not, I guess, be put in Gitweb::Request.
> They would be in catch-all Gitweb module, I guess, or perhaps in the
> later post-GSoC future in Gitweb::Dispatch or something.
Yes.
Show 60 quoted lines
>> @@ -689,7 +651,6 @@ sub run_request {
>>  our $is_last_request = sub { 1 };
>>  our ($pre_dispatch_hook, $post_dispatch_hook, $pre_listen_hook);
>>  our $CGI = 'CGI';
>> -our $cgi;
>>  sub evaluate_argv {
>>       return unless (@ARGV);
>
> Ah, so $CGI is left in gitweb.perl, $cgi is moved to Gitweb::Request.
>
> [cut more than half of patch, which sould not be needed with exporting
>  variables and not using fully qualified variable names]
>
>> diff --git a/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Request.pm b/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Request.pm
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..91cc492
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gitweb/lib/Gitweb/Request.pm
>> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
>> +#!/usr/bin/perl
>> +#
>> +# Gitweb::Request -- gitweb request(cgi) package
>> +#
>> +# This program is licensed under the GPLv2
>
> I don't remember what is git policy on copyright statements, and on
> GPLv2 vs GPLv2+...
>
>> +
>> +package Gitweb::Request;
>> +
>> +use strict;
>> +
>> +BEGIN {
>> +     use Exporter();
>> +
>> +     @Gitweb::Request::ISA = qw(Exporter);
>> +     @Gitweb::Request::EXPORT = qw();
>> +}
>
> Same comment as for previous patch.
>
>   use Exporter qw(import);
>   our @EXPORT = qw($cgi, $my_url, $my_uri, $base_url, ...);
>
> BTW with exporting variables you can easily see here that
> Gitweb::Request does not use any variable from Gitweb::Config.
>
>> +
>> +our ($cgi, $my_url, $my_uri, $base_url, $path_info, $home_link);
>> +our ($action, $project, $file_name, $file_parent, $hash, $hash_parent, $hash_base,
>> +     $hash_parent_base, @extra_options, $page, $git_dir);
>> +our ($searchtype, $search_use_regexp, $searchtext, $search_regexp);
>> +
>> +sub evaluate_uri {
> [...]
>> +}
>
> Straightforward code movement.  But see comment above on which
> subroutines I feel should be also put in Gitweb::Request.
Please answer the question regarding calls to not-yet-packaged subroutines.

Thanks, Pavan.

Jakub Narebski· Jun 3, 2010, 10:17 UTC · re: Pavan Kumar Sunkara · lore

Re: About [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Create a perl module to handle gitweb cgi params and vars

On Tue, 3 Jun 2010, Pavan Kumar Sunkara wrote:
> Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> Shouldn't evaluate_query_params(), evaluate_path_info(), and the
>> subroutine that ties them together evaluate_and_validate_params() be
>> in Gitweb::Request too?
>>
>> Ditto with evaluate_git_dir()?
> 
> Well, evaluate_and_validate_params() and evaluate_path_info() contains
> calls to subroutines which are not yet moved into any package. So,
> what do you want to in such a case ?

O.K., in this case you should mention in the commit message that the subroutines evaluate_query_params(), evaluate_path_info(), evaluate_and_validate_params() and evaluate_git_dir() didn't get moved to Gitweb::Request because evaluate_and_validate_params() and evaluate_path_info() contain calls to check_head_link(), die_error() and validate_*() subroutines which are not yet moved into any package. And it doesn't make sense to put only some of them in Gitweb::Request.

We can always move them later.

P.S. The validate_*() subroutines could also be moved to Gitweb::Request. The check_head_link() subroutine looks like candidate for Gitweb::Util / Gitweb::Utils; I am not sure where one should put die_error() and friends: git_header_html(), git_footer_html(), get_page_title(), and other subroutines they use.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland

← back to recent threads