Re: [PATCH 1/2] http-backend: Fix access beyond end of string.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 42 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 05:36:54PM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>> ...
>>> Shouldn't this instead be:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/http-backend.c b/http-backend.c
>>> index 9021266..16ec635 100644
>>> --- a/http-backend.c
>>> +++ b/http-backend.c
>>> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>> }
>>>
>>> cmd = c;
>>> - cmd_arg = xmalloc(n);
>>> + cmd_arg = xmalloc(n + 1);
>>> strncpy(cmd_arg, dir + out[0].rm_so + 1, n);
>>> cmd_arg[n] = '\0';
>>> dir[out[0].rm_so] = 0;
>>>
>>> The cmd_arg string was simply allocated too small. Your fix is
>>> terminating the string one character too short which would cause
>>> get_loose_object and get_pack_file to break.
>>
>> Actually, from my reading, I think his fix is right, because you trim
>> the first character during the strncpy (using "out[0].rm_so + 1").
>
> Your regexps all start with leading "/", and rm_so+1 points at the
> character after the slash; the intention being that you would copy
> the rest of the matched sequence without the leading "/".
>
> So allocating n = rm_eo - rm_so is Ok. It counts the space for
> terminating NUL. But copying "up to n bytes" using strncpy(), only to NUL
> terminate immediately later, is dubious. You would want to copy only n-1
> bytes. I.e.
>
> n = out[0].rm_eo - out[0].rm_so; /* allocation */
> ... validate and fail invalid method ...
> cmd_arg = xmalloc(n);
> memcpy(cmd_arg, dir + out[0].rm_so + 1, n-1);
> cmd_arg[n-1] = '\0';
>
I think the strncpy( , ,n) would not harm anything because we won't overflow dir because it's NUL terminated in getdir(), and the '\0' shouldn't match the regex. But I agree that strncpy( , , n-1) is better and memcpy( , , n-1) is better still.
Better eyes than mine have now looked at this and see different things each time. I wonder if some parts could be made a little less subtle (perhaps along with the dir[out[0].rm_so] = 0;)?
Thanks, Tarmigan