Johannes SchindelinHi,
check this out:
http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git
Ciao, Dscho
Johannes Schindelin
Sverre RabbelierRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
Heya,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:38, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git
About time! Totally awesome though. Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;)
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier
Johannes SchindelinRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
Hi,
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:38, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git > > About time! Totally awesome though. > Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;)
Except that it is run by Subversion people, and therefore it by like asking git.or.cz to serve Mercurial repositories ;-)
Ciao, Dscho
Sverre RabbelierRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
Heya,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:01, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:38, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git
It seems there's a bunch of sillyness in there, such as them recommending backup over rsync?! They should be telling people to just make a clone, and in the case of a crash they can push the clone back up! Also, maybe we can tell them git learned how to clone empty repo's recently?
Show 5 quoted lines
>> About time! Totally awesome though. >> Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;) > > Except that it is run by Subversion people, and therefore it by like > asking git.or.cz to serve Mercurial repositories ;-)
Heh, speaking of Hg, I heard they're adding DVCS support to code.google.com soon, if they're already adding a non-svn VCS, why not git? :D
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier
Johannes SchindelinRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
Hi,
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:01, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:38, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git > > It seems there's a bunch of sillyness in there, such as them > recommending backup over rsync?! They should be telling people to just > make a clone, and in the case of a crash they can push the clone back > up! > Also, maybe we can tell them git learned how to clone empty repo's recently?
It's not in any release yet, is it?
Show 9 quoted lines
> >> About time! Totally awesome though. > >> Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;) > > > > Except that it is run by Subversion people, and therefore it by like > > asking git.or.cz to serve Mercurial repositories ;-) > > Heh, speaking of Hg, I heard they're adding DVCS support to > code.google.com soon, if they're already adding a non-svn VCS, why not > git? :D
Well, you work in the shop. Lots of politics, my son, lots of politics.
Ciao, Dscho
Sverre RabbelierRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
Heya,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Also, maybe we can tell them git learned how to clone empty repo's recently? > > It's not in any release yet, is it?
True, that. But when it is we can? What with 1.6.2 soon-to-be-released and all?
> Well, you work in the shop. Lots of politics, my son, lots of politics.
Yeah, it was mostly wishful thinking from my side. There's some work being done on git and hg interoperability though, so if worst comes to worst, I could live with using something like git-hg ;).
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier
Miles BaderRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> Well, you work in the shop. Lots of politics, my son, lots of politics. > > Yeah, it was mostly wishful thinking from my side. There's some work > being done on git and hg interoperability though, so if worst comes to > worst, I could live with using something like git-hg ;).
Is code.google.com really that bad...?
I always thought google was supposed to be a bit better than the other guys...
-Miles
-- Carefully crafted initial estimates reward you not only with reduced computational effort, but also with understanding and increased self-esteem. -- Numerical methods in C, Chapter 9. "Root Finding and Nonlinear Sets of Equations"
Sverre RabbelierRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
Heya,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 08:50, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> Is code.google.com really that bad...?
It is currently, since they only host svn ;).
> I always thought google was supposed to be a bit better than the other > guys...
Who knows, at the moment though, they only have svn and I'm personally not holding my breath for git support anytime soon.
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier
Felipe ContrerasRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> writes: >>> Well, you work in the shop. Lots of politics, my son, lots of politics. >> >> Yeah, it was mostly wishful thinking from my side. There's some work >> being done on git and hg interoperability though, so if worst comes to >> worst, I could live with using something like git-hg ;). > > Is code.google.com really that bad...?
I think it's almost perfect... except for the choice of VCS.
-- Felipe Contreras
Felipe ContrerasRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Heya, > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:01, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: >> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: >>> About time! Totally awesome though. >>> Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;) >> >> Except that it is run by Subversion people, and therefore it by like >> asking git.or.cz to serve Mercurial repositories ;-) > > Heh, speaking of Hg, I heard they're adding DVCS support to > code.google.com soon, if they're already adding a non-svn VCS, why not > git? :D
Well, git has become so freakingly popular that supporting any DVCS that is not git would generate lots of complaints.
-- Felipe Contreras
Sverre RabbelierRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
Heya,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:10, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, git has become so freakingly popular that supporting any DVCS > that is not git would generate lots of complaints.
Hehe, since when have big company's ever bothered with 'lots of complaints'? ;) I mean, they're offering a free service, they can always hide behind "if you don't like it, use something else".
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier
Grzegorz KossakowskiRe: Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
Johannes Schindelin pisze:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Hi, > > check this out: > > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git
Great news.
I have some more. At Apache we are in the process of setting up official Git mirror of our SVN repository.
It may sound like nothing really big but first step (even small) is important. We are already discussing how we could change our work-flow if we have more powerful tools in place.
Personally, I would like to thank Git community for producing such great piece of software and supporting it here in very professional and vivid way.
-- Best regards, Grzegorz Kossakowski