threads / patch / 15758

patchgitweb: Add path_info tests to t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh

Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: Add path_info tests to t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh

## tl;dr

3 messages between Oct 2, 2008 and Oct 2, 2008. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 2people: 3as markdown or json

Jakub Narebski· Oct 2, 2008, 14:52 UTC · lore

Note that those tests only that there are no errors nor warnings from Perl; they do not check for example if gitweb doesn't use ARRAY(0x8e3cc20) instead of correct value in links, etc.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
---
This is the test thans to which I have dicovered errors in git_tree()
fixed in previous email. Nevertheless those two patches are unrelated,
so they are not numbered.

Those tests check _current_ situation, without $action, not $hash_parent parameters possible in path_info.

 t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Show changes to t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh +49 −0
diff --git a/t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh b/t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh
index 07117a8..64c4cce 100755
--- a/t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh
+++ b/t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh
@@ -503,6 +503,55 @@ test_expect_success \
 test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
 
 # ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# path_info links
+test_expect_success \
+	'path_info: project' \
+	'gitweb_run "" "/.git"'
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
+
+test_expect_success \
+	'path_info: project/branch' \
+	'gitweb_run "" "/.git/b"'
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
+
+test_expect_success \
+	'path_info: project/branch:file' \
+	'gitweb_run "" "/.git/master:file"'
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
+
+test_expect_success \
+	'path_info: project/branch:dir/' \
+	'gitweb_run "" "/.git/master:foo/"'
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
+
+test_expect_success \
+	'path_info: project/branch:file (non-existent)' \
+	'gitweb_run "" "/.git/master:non-existent"'
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
+
+test_expect_success \
+	'path_info: project/branch:dir/ (non-existent)' \
+	'gitweb_run "" "/.git/master:non-existent/"'
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
+
+
+test_expect_success \
+	'path_info: project/branch:/file' \
+	'gitweb_run "" "/.git/master:/file"'
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
+
+test_expect_success \
+	'path_info: project/:/file (implicit HEAD)' \
+	'gitweb_run "" "/.git/:/file"'
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
+
+test_expect_success \
+	'path_info: project/:/ (implicit HEAD, top tree)' \
+	'gitweb_run "" "/.git/:/"'
+test_debug 'cat gitweb.log'
+
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 # feed generation
 
 test_expect_success \
Petr Baudis· Oct 2, 2008, 15:07 UTC · re: Jakub Narebski · lore

Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Add path_info tests to t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 04:52:20PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Note that those tests only that there are no errors nor warnings
> from Perl; they do not check for example if gitweb doesn't use
> ARRAY(0x8e3cc20) instead of correct value in links, etc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
> ---
> This is the test thans to which I have dicovered errors in git_tree()
> fixed in previous email. Nevertheless those two patches are unrelated,
> so they are not numbered.
> 
> Those tests check _current_ situation, without $action, not
> $hash_parent parameters possible in path_info.
I didn't test the patch but it all looks sensible.
Acked-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Eric Raible· Oct 2, 2008, 16:41 UTC · re: Jakub Narebski · lore

Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Add path_info tests to t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh

Jakub Narebski <jnareb <at> gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> 
> Note that those tests only that there are no errors nor warnings
> from Perl; they do not check for example if gitweb doesn't use
> ARRAY(0x8e3cc20) instead of correct value in links, etc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb <at> gmail.com>
> ---
s/only that/only check that/

← back to recent threads