Re: [PATCH 0/6] post-strbuf_getline cleanups

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Feb 1, 2016, 02:14 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqzivlw51y.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160131112215.GA4589@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> As promised, here are the "how about this on top" patches that came out
> of the discussion for the "strbuf_getline" series in:
>
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.msysgit/21773/focus=284001

Thanks for following up.

Show 12 quoted lines

> As I looked further at some of the option-parsing cleanups, I realized
> that some of them are more than cleanups; we're actually fixing bizarre
> behavior and segfaults.
>
>   [1/6]: give "nbuf" strbuf a more meaningful name
>   [2/6]: checkout-index: simplify "-z" option parsing
>   [3/6]: checkout-index: handle "--no-prefix" option
>   [4/6]: checkout-index: handle "--no-index" option
>   [5/6]: checkout-index: disallow "--no-stage" option
>   [6/6]: apply, ls-files: simplify "-z" parsing
>
> -Peff