Re: [PATCH 1/2] read_and_strip_branch: fix typo'd address-of operator
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 29, 2015, 06:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqy4omds1u.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150128225755.GA15719@peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> This is not the first time I've seen this chomp/trim distinction come > up. However, the thing that has prevented me from writing strbuf_chomp > is that the trim is almost always a more reasonable choice. > ... > End mini-rant. :)
Thanks.