Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2023, #07; Mon, 31)

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Aug 1, 2023, 20:35 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqy1iua4c4.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CAJoAoZngMcN-0-5q1y-zX5552QhgRHCrKULQ7hKyJgcCoSQJNQ@mail.gmail.com>

Emily Shaffer <nasamuffin@google.com> writes:

Show 10 quoted lines

>> Or are there still further changes in behaviours planned?
>
> Huh, I thought that you wanted further changes. In
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/ZDSTFwMFO7vbj%2Fdu@google.com/ I was
> asking for opinions on adding tests; if you're fine to take it without
> tests, then of course I don't have an objection to an identical patch
> with objectively improved grammar in the commit message. But since you
> were asking for a reroll in the What's Cooking, I figured there was
> more you were unhappy with in the patch. If that's not the case, by
> all means, go ahead and take it.

Well, this is why an overly slow reaction is bad for everybody.

I quite honestly do not recall what was suggested and with what severity (was it a good to have? was it a showstopper?).

Anyway, if it is not urgent and nobody else is jumping up and down and asking for an immediate inclusion of the current iteration, we can wait a bit longer without hurting anybody ;-)

Thanks.