Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2024, #10; Thu, 28)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 2, 2024, 00:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqy10ylxzp.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <fbda37b9-41e7-4b18-a831-dfb5a9a9c54f@gmail.com>
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Hi Junio > > On 28/11/2024 05:35, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * cw/worktree-extension (2024-11-26) 8 commits >> - worktree: refactor `repair_worktree_after_gitdir_move()` >> - worktree: add relative cli/config options to `repair` command >> - worktree: add relative cli/config options to `move` command >> - worktree: add relative cli/config options to `add` command >> - worktree: add `write_worktree_linking_files()` function >> - worktree: refactor infer_backlink return >> - worktree: add `relativeWorktrees` extension >> - setup: correctly reinitialize repository version >> Introduce a new repository extension to prevent older Git versions >> from mis-interpreting worktrees created with relative paths. >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: <20241125-wt_relative_options-v5-0-356d122ff3db@pm.me> > > I've had a look at the range-diff for the latest version and had a > query about the removal of a check from one of the tests[1]. Perhaps > we should wait to hear from Caleb about that, but if you're keen to > get these merged down in time for the next release we could just fix > up the test later if it turns out to be necessary - I think the code > changes are all fine.
Thanks for reviewing (and thanks Caleb for working on) this topic. I see the latest iteration v6 has added back the extension checking, so we probably are good to go.