Re: [PATCH] Additional git-archive tests
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 5, 2013, 19:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqwqjj3wit.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA9E9538-E39B-41CA-BB82-BDD8CF7A2E3F@mac.com>
Nick Townsend <nick.townsend@mac.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Interplay between paths specified in three ways now tested: > * After a : in the tree-ish, > * As a pathspec in the command, > * By virtue of the current working directory > > Note that these tests are based on the behaviours > as found in 1.8.5. They may not be intentional. > They were developed to regression test enhancements > made to parse_treeish_arg() in archive.c
In other words, are all these new tests expected to pass?
My cursory read of parse_treeish_arg() in archive.c is:
- It reads the given object with get_sha1(), checking if it is a commit-ish or tree-ish to decide if it wants to add the pax header to record the commit object name;
- It parses the tree object;
- If run from a subdirectory, attempts to grab the "prefix" (i.e. the path to the current subdirectory---in the tests you added, they are all "a/") out of that tree object (it errors out if it can't); and then
- It archives the tree object.
So I do not think it is expected to accept tree object names with the HEAD:<path> style syntax, if the user expects a predictable and consistent result. The third step above attempts to make sure that you name a tree-ish that corresponds to the top-level of the project, i.e. with no <path>.
What seems to be supported are:
cd a && git archive HEAD ;# archives HEAD:a tree
cd a && git archive HEAD -- b ;# archives a/b/ part of HEAD:a as b/Specifically, it appears that HEAD:./b, HEAD:b etc. are not designed to work, at least to me.
I am not saying that these should _not_ work, but it is unclear what it means to "work". For example, what should this do?
cd a && git archive HEAD:./b $pathspec
The extended SHA-1 expression HEAD:./b in the subdirectory a/ is interpreted by get_sha1_with_context_1() to be the name of the tree object at path "a/b" in the commit HEAD. Further, you are giving a pathspec while in a subdirectory a/ to the command. What should that pathspec be relative to?
In a normal Git command, the pathspec always is relative to the current subdirectory, so, the way to learn about the tree object a/b/c in the HEAD while in subdirectory a/ would be:
cd a && git ls-tree HEAD b/c
But what should the command line for archive to grab HEAD:a/b/c be? It feels wrong to say:
cd a && git archive HEAD:./b b/c
and it also feels wrong to say
cd a && git archive HEAD:./b c
No matter what we would do, we should behave consistently with this case:
treeish=$(git rev-parse HEAD:a/b) &&
cd a &&
git archive $treeish -- $pathspecso "take the pathspec relative to the tree when the treeish was given with '<treeish>:<path>' syntax, and otherwise treat it relative to the cwd" is not a workable solution.
Show 86 quoted lines
> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> > Signed-off-by: Nick Townsend <nick.townsend@mac.com> > --- > t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh b/t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh > index 67f3b54..a81a836 100755 > --- a/t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh > +++ b/t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh > @@ -113,4 +113,75 @@ test_expect_success 'archive empty subtree by direct pathspec' ' > check_dir extract sub > ' > > +test_expect_success 'setup - repository with subdirs' ' > + mkdir -p a/b/c a/b/d && > + echo af >a/af && > + echo bf >a/b/bf && > + echo cf >a/b/c/cf && > + git add a && > + git commit -m "commit 1" && > + git tag -a -m "rev-1" rev-1 > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'archive subtree from root by treeish' ' > + git archive --format=tar HEAD:a >atreeroot.tar && > + make_dir extract && > + "$TAR" xf atreeroot.tar -C extract && > + check_dir extract af b b/bf b/c b/c/cf > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'archive subtree from root with pathspec' ' > + git archive --format=tar HEAD a >atreepath.tar && > + make_dir extract && > + "$TAR" xf atreepath.tar -C extract && > + check_dir extract a a/af a/b a/b/bf a/b/c a/b/c/cf > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'archive subtree from root by 2-level treeish' ' > + git archive --format=tar HEAD:a/b >abtreeroot.tar && > + make_dir extract && > + "$TAR" xf abtreeroot.tar -C extract && > + check_dir extract bf c c/cf > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'archive subtree from subdir' ' > + ( > + cd a && > + git archive --format=tar HEAD >../asubtree.tar > + ) && > + make_dir extract && > + "$TAR" xf asubtree.tar -C extract && > + check_dir extract af b b/bf b/c b/c/cf > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'archive subtree from subdir with treeish' ' > + ( > + cd a && > + git archive --format=tar HEAD:./b >../absubtree.tar > + ) && > + make_dir extract && > + "$TAR" xf absubtree.tar -C extract && > + check_dir extract bf c c/cf > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'archive subtree from subdir with treeish and pathspec' ' > + ( > + cd a && > + git archive --format=tar HEAD:./b c >../absubtree.tar > + ) && > + make_dir extract && > + "$TAR" xf absubtree.tar -C extract && > + check_dir extract c c/cf > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'archive subtree from subdir with alt treeish' ' > + ( > + cd a && > + git archive --format=tar HEAD:b >../abxsubtree.tar > + ) && > + make_dir extract && > + "$TAR" xf abxsubtree.tar -C extract && > + check_dir extract bf c c/cf > +' > + > test_done