Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] connect: call get_host_and_port() earlier
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 20, 2016, 22:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqwpmobcd4.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160520221430.GA28273@glandium.org>
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
>> Can never happen because? >> >> !*port means get_host_and_port() made the "port" pointer point at >> a NUL byte. That does not happen because the only case port is >> moved by that function is to have it point at a byte after we >> found ':', and the "port" string is a decimal integer whose value >> is between 0 and 65535, so there is no way port points at an empty >> string. >> >> OK. > > Do you want me to add this to the commit message in a possible v7?
No.
I was merely thinking aloud to see if "in a case that never can happen" is sufficient decsription. I think it is ;-)
Show 10 quoted lines
>> This looks strange.... > v3 of this series did remove this get_port(), and broke the > '[host:port]:path' syntax as a consequence. The reason this happens is > that get_host_and_port, in that case, is called with [host:port], sees > the square brackets, and searches the port *after* the closing bracket, > because the usual case where square brackets appear is ipv6 addresses, > which contain colons, and the brackets in that case are used to separate > the host and the port. > > In that case, get_host_and_port returns "host:port" and null.
Doesn't that indicate that this codepath deserves some in-code comment?