Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] getting rid of most "static struct lock_file"s
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 10, 2018, 06:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqwowcjbh6.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180510052137.GC27259@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> I don't think it's worth re-rolling, but one thing to think about for > future cleanups: you split the patches by touched area, not by > functionality. So the first three patches have a "while we're here..." > that has to explain why dropping the "static" is the right thing over > and over. If you instead did the error-handling fixes independently > first, then you could lump the "static" cleanups together with one > explanation (possibly even just as part of the 4th patch).
Thanks Peff for a good pice of advice. I agree with the assessment after reading the series through (includng "not worth rerolling" part).
Thanks, Martin.