Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2020, #02; Wed, 10)

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Jun 11, 2020, 00:27 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqwo4ecuql.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200610235713.GX6569@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>

"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:

Show 9 quoted lines

> On 2020-06-10 at 23:36:30, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> * bc/sha-256-part-2 (2020-05-27) 44 commits
>> ...
>>  - t1050: match object ID paths in a hash-insensitive way
>> 
>>  SHA-256 migration work continues.
>
> I assume you're waiting for something on this, and it's probably a
> review, but I didn't see a comment to that effect.  Am I correct?

More or less. It actually is weaker; I didn't have enough energy to give attention to the topic between issue #1 and issue #2 this month to even bother adding such a comment. By default nothing happens without input, and I try not to be the only reviewer of a large topic like this one---I always prefer to have second sets of eyes.

Thanks for working on it. A large refactoring like this one, the sooner we can absorb it, the less blocking it would be for other topics in flight.