Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] No-lazy-fetch has_object() and some fixes
Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Since v1, I've took a look at 3 other cases that use has_object_file():
> 2 don't need lazy-fetching (patches 3 and 4 in this set) and 1 does -
> "cat-file -e" - although I think this is a special case. So I still
> think that not lazy-fetching when checking object existence is more
> likely, and should be privileged with the shorter function name
> (has_object() instead of has_object_locally()).
Show 19 quoted lines
>
> Changes from v1:
> - Patch split into 2 (patch 1 and patch 2)
> - 2 additional patches that fix bugs by making use of the new function
>
> Jonathan Tan (4):
> sha1-file: introduce no-lazy-fetch has_object()
> apply: do not lazy fetch when applying binary
> pack-objects: no fetch when allow-{any,promisor}
> fsck: do not lazy fetch known non-promisor object
>
> Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 11 +++++++----
> apply.c | 2 +-
> builtin/fsck.c | 2 +-
> builtin/pack-objects.c | 4 ++--
> object-store.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> sha1-file.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> t/t4150-am.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>