Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gc: let feature.experimental imply gc.cruftPacks
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 26, 2022, 20:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqwn8mfgsj.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <cover.1666815209.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> This is a moderately-sized reroll of Emily's series from [1], which I > saw while sifting through old mail in my inbox. > > That series was sent when I was on vacation, which is a likely > explanation for why I most likely missed it. > > I'm sending a reroll out on Emily's behalf, since the series hasn't > received any activity in a few months, and I would like to see the > topic pushed forward.
Yeah, it has been quite a while. I'd prefer to at least see an Ack by the original author before proceeding.
In my quick scan of the original round https://lore.kernel.org/git/20220803205721.3686361-1-emilyshaffer@google.com/
the new round appears to address all the points raised. It was so long time ago that I am not sure if reviewers stopped after seeing minor points that need to be addressed, or there were only minor issues in the original series, though.
Thanks.