Everyday contents (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2014, #04; Tue, 22))
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 30, 2014, 17:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqvbqezs64.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqegx95bxc.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Continued: this message only covers the third part (out of the four sections).
| Integrator[[Integrator]] | ------------------------ | | A fairly central person acting as the integrator in a group | project receives changes made by others, reviews and integrates | them and publishes the result for others to use, using these | commands in addition to the ones needed by participants.
This definition of who an "integrator" is, and it being a separate role when we discuss various workflows, are still sound, I think.
| * linkgit:git-pull[1] to merge from your trusted lieutenants.
Among these enumerated items, we may want to reword this a little bit to hint that this section also applies to GitHub pull-request workflow. However, I am not sure how their "merge without first locally checking" action on their website fits in the picture.
| Examples | ~~~~~~~~ | | My typical Git day.::
This probably shouldn't talk about "My" in the first place, but in any case I work somewhat differently (cf. howto/maintain-git.txt) these days.
| + | ------------ | $ git status <1> | $ git show-branch <2>
This is more like "git branch --no-merged master" (and similarly for 'next' and 'pu'), and is helped by "Meta/cook -w" but this document is a wrong place to talk about the latter.
| $ mailx <3> | & s 2 3 4 5 ./+to-apply | & s 7 8 ./+hold-linus | & q | $ git checkout -b topic/one master | $ git am -3 -i -s -u ./+to-apply <4>
No need to give -u these days.
| $ compile/test | $ git checkout -b hold/linus && git am -3 -i -s -u ./+hold-linus <5>
Again, no "-u" necessary.
| $ git checkout topic/one && git rebase master <6> | $ git checkout pu && git reset --hard next <7> | $ git merge topic/one topic/two && git merge hold/linus <8> | $ git checkout maint | $ git cherry-pick master~4 <9> | $ compile/test | $ git tag -s -m "GIT 0.99.9x" v0.99.9x <10> | $ git fetch ko && git show-branch master maint 'tags/ko-*' <11>
This step I still use show-branch, but like this:
for branch in master maint next pu
do
git show-branch ko/$branch $branch
doneand the purpose explained in the footnote is still valid.
| $ git push ko <12> | $ git push ko v0.99.9x <13>
I no longer have to do the last step <13>, instead the step <12> reads more like
git push --follow-tags ko
| ------------ | + | <1> see what I was in the middle of doing, if any. | <2> see what topic branches I have and think about how ready | they are.
With "show-branch" replaced with "branch --no-merged", the purpose of this step is still the same.
| <3> read mails, save ones that are applicable, and save others | that are not quite ready. | <4> apply them, interactively, with my sign-offs. | <5> create topic branch as needed and apply, again with my | sign-offs. | <6> rebase internal topic branch that has not been merged to the | master or exposed as a part of a stable branch. | <7> restart `pu` every time from the next. | <8> and bundle topic branches still cooking. | <9> backport a critical fix. | <10> create a signed tag. | <11> make sure I did not accidentally rewind master beyond what I | already pushed out. `ko` shorthand points at the repository I have | at kernel.org, and looks like this:
No longer it looks like that ;-)
| + | ------------ | $ cat .git/remotes/ko | URL: kernel.org:/pub/scm/git/git.git | Pull: master:refs/tags/ko-master | Pull: next:refs/tags/ko-next | Pull: maint:refs/tags/ko-maint | Push: master | Push: next | Push: +pu | Push: maint | ------------ | +
... because we encourage people to use in-config description of remotes these days, which should look like this:
(in .git/config)
[remote "ko"]
url = kernel.org:/pub/scm/git/git.git
fetch = refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/ko/*
push = refs/heads/master
push = refs/heads/next
push = +refs/heads/pu
push = refs/heads/maintAlso tracking is done via refs/remotes/ko/, no longer with tags/.
| In the output from `git show-branch`, `master` should have | everything `ko-master` has, and `next` should have | everything `ko-next` has.
With s|ko-master|ko/master| and s|ko-next|ko/next|, the above is still valid.
| <12> push out the bleeding edge.
s/edge./edge, together with new tags that point into my history./
| <13> push the tag out, too.
Drop this.