Re: New semantic patches vs. in-flight topics [was: Re: [PATCH 00/19] Bring more repository handles into our code base]
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 23, 2018, 04:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqva5ts32x.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kaWaY+oxJfoMbsCcq6MZDPoq1OgOwK0a9mkKR7sUEOHpg@mail.gmail.com>
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
> Am I overestimating or misunderstanding rerere here?
Yes.
Show 5 quoted lines
> Would it be realistic for next and master branch instead of pu? > > I'd be wary for the master branch, as we may not want to rely on > spatch without review. (It can produce funny white space issues, > but seems to produce working/correct code)
Yes, that is why I think it is a bit too late to do the "fixup with spatch" after merging to 'next' and 'master'.