Re: GitGitGadget's website is responsive, how about kernel.org?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 14, 2026, 16:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqv7eywe4t.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <DH2ADSKXNCXG.2DM7T0NF5NH59@ritovision.com>
"Rito Rhymes" <rito@ritovision.com> writes:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Actually... > > now that I've had time to think about it (and get some > rest), I think it's best to keep the patch series review and > discussion all in this thread, publicly and transparently. > > I initially defaulted to sending it separately to Konstantin directly > because this is Git's archive, and I wanted to respect convention by > keeping the thread appropriately scoped. At first, this seemed more like > just a routing touchpoint. > > But seeing as there is no public mailing list for kernel.org's repo > specifically, and this is basically already a sidecar thread about the > site theme patch, we might as well consolidate the process here for > simplicity and transparency. Plus, I imagine the site matters to most > people in Git, and the mailing list is archived on lore.kernel.org > anyway... > > This will allow anyone to review the code and comment on it. > > I'm sending the patch series again directly in this thread, and I > think we should keep communication contained here (unless someone has > a better idea).
I would not object discussion here, and I personally do not mind having to see, and possibly ignore, more patches on this list, but to those who come here to work with and work on Git, I am reasonably sure that it will look offtopic to discuss how the k.org website appears and behaves, and/or how a better version of it would appear and behave.
I'll leave Konstantin with the final say. I hope there are better places, even though I do not now where they are as I do not do websites. I've seen folks with accounts at k.org discuss things on mailing lists that is more limited for kernel.org users.