Re: [PATCH 03/14] lockfile: remove some redundant functions
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2015, 17:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqtwuflawx.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <0d17c04842bef618ecd474c56f2dbcf6a613a379.1433751986.git.mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Remove the following functions and rewrite their callers to use the > equivalent tempfile functions directly: > > * fdopen_lock_file() -> fdopen_tempfile() > * reopen_lock_file() -> reopen_tempfile() > * close_lock_file() -> close_tempfile()
Hmph,
My knee-jerk reaction was "I thought lockfile abstraction was fine---why do we expose the implementation detail of the lockfile, which is now happen to be implemented on top of the tempfile API, to the callers?" I guess that was also where my comments on 02/14 "why do callers have to include tempfile.h separately?" came from.
I'm undecided but would trust your judgement until I read thru to the end of the series ;-).