Re: Obsolete instruction in SubmittingPatches?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 1, 2018, 21:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqtvtzeakc.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <927e3166-9c60-fca5-ab41-f6d38380c1b1@gmail.com>
Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On 01.03.2018 0:54, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Is this part of guidelines obsolete, or am I not understanding this >>> correctly? >> >> I am merely being nice (but only on "time-permitting" basis). > > Does that mean that the integration of a series is easier, when there is > a re-send?
When I am not interested in a topic, or there are other reviewers who are more qualified and are interested in the topic than I am, the protocol to require the final "Here is a verbatim final resend, the only difference from what was reviewed is the reviewed-by's from the reviewers." will let me completely ignore the topic while it is being discussed (as long as I trust the judgment of these reviewers).
Otherwise I'd need to keep track of the progress of the discussion on each and every topic, which is often impossible.