Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: add platform support policy
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 30, 2024, 21:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqttg6a7zj.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJoAoZn57LMCz9dmU3u+2HS1urOcoY1HQA6axh0cWoGchS_KFA@mail.gmail.com>
Emily Shaffer <nasamuffin@google.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
>> > +Note that this document is about maintaining existing support for a platform >> > +that has generally worked in the past; for adding support to a platform which >> > +doesn't generally work with Git, the stakeholders for that platform are expected >> > +to do the bulk of that work themselves. We will consider such patches if they >> > +don't make life harder for other supported platforms, and you may well find a >> > +contributor interested in working on that support, but the Git community as a >> > +whole doesn't feel an obligation to perform such work. >> >> The part after "... and you may well find" reads a bit muddy. I >> couldn't tell if it is talking about the initial port, or continued >> support, or both. >> ... > I like that message, but what I was trying to say with that sentence > was "if you get lucky, some volunteer might want to help you with the > initial port".
FWIW, I do not quite like that message; I agree that it would be good to tell them that they may not entirely be on their own, if they ask nicely, but no promises ;-).
Show 11 quoted lines
> It seems worth at least pointing out that that would be
> the exception, not the rule, but I probably already do that well
> enough with the previous sentence ("the platform stakeholders are
> expected to do the bulk of the work"). Let me reword the last
> sentence, then:
>
> "We will consider patches that port a new platform if they don't make
> life harder for other support platforms or for Git contributors. Some
> Git contributors may volunteer to help with the initial or continued
> support, but that is not a given. Support work which is too intrusive
> or difficult for the project to maintain may still not be accepted."OK, at least that clarifies the point I was puzzled about.