Re: [PATCH 0/3] Comment fixes

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sep 27, 2017, 00:13 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqshf980dv.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170926112150.21850-1-hanwen@google.com>

Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> writes:

> follow more commit log conventions; verified it compiled (yay).

;-)

> (should I send patches that are in 'pu' again as well?)

Because these look more or less independent changes that can be queued on separate topics, I do not think resending is needed at all, even though mentioning that these do *not* replace what is queued like you just did is an excellent way to prevent the maintainer from making stupid mistakes. Thanks.

Show 14 quoted lines

> Han-Wen Nienhuys (3):
>   real_path: clarify return value ownership
>   read_gitfile_gently: clarify return value ownership.
>   string-list.h: move documentation from Documentation/api/ into header
>
>  Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt | 209 ----------------------------
>  abspath.c                                   |   4 +
>  setup.c                                     |   3 +-
>  string-list.h                               | 192 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt
>
> --
> 2.14.1.821.g8fa685d3b7-goog