Re: [RESEND] git-rebase.txt: rewrite docu for fixup/squash (again)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 21, 2023, 00:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqsf64omdi.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <b5bc179d-46b6-4c48-bfe5-769dac38489b@xiplink.com>
Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> writes:
> I should have added "as a convenience". Squash and fixup are similar > enough that it seems reasonable for them to both support -c. Saves > people from having to remember that only fixup allows -c.
Yeah, "fixup" could have been a plain "squash" with some option. It could have been two options, "-i" ("ignore message of this one") and "-o" ("use message of this one alone"), and then today's "fixup" would have been "squash -i", and today's "fixup -c" would have been "squash -o".
But I agree that "squash -c" is something one may find tempting to type, after learning "fixup -c".
I forgot to comment on the real contents of your review, by the way. Everything you said was reasonable.