git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Git stash gpg prompting

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
May 30, 2014, 20:31 UTC
Message-ID
<xmqqr43b80um.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To
<20140530202413.GD5513@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> However, I wonder if it is really ever going to be sane to set
> commit.gpgsign and not use something like gpg-agent.
>
> For example, if you
> were to ever "git rebase" a patch series (or even just use "git rebase
> -i" to refactor commits), you would be prompted for your passphrase to
> sign each individual patch.
Correct.

I actually doubt it is sane to set commit.gpgsign to true and trust gpg-agent, but that is a separate issue.

Previous: Jeff King
Message 3 of 3 in “Git stash gpg prompting”
  1. Eddie MongeMay 30, 2014
  2. Jeff KingMay 30, 2014
  3. Junio C HamanoMay 30, 2014

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.