Re: [PATCH] Documentation/i18n.txt: clarify character encoding support
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 17, 2015, 20:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqr3pa5aix.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <557EA421.5050706@gmail.com>
Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
>> I do not think the removal of the text makes much sense here unless >> you add the equivalent to the new text below. >> >>> - The contents of the blob objects are uninterpreted sequences >>> of bytes. There is no encoding translation at the core >>> level. >>> >>> - - The commit log messages are uninterpreted sequences of non-NUL >>> - bytes. >>> + - Pathnames are encoded in UTF-8 normalization form C. This >> >> That is true only on some systems like OSX (with HFS+) and Windows, >> no? BSDs in general and Linux do not do any such mangling IIRC. > > Modern Unices don't need any such mangling because UTF-8 NFC should > be the default system encoding. I'm not sure for BSDs, but it has > been the default on all major Linux distros for more than 10 years.
So? All major distros do not have to worry (and do not even need to know). As I said,...
>> I >> am OK with mangling described as a notable oddball to warn users, >> though; i.e. not as a norm as your new text suggests but as an >> exception.
... I am OK to describe "pathnames are mangled into UTF-8 NFC on certain filesystems" as a warning. I am OK if we encourage the use of UTF-8, especially if a project wants to be forward looking (i.e. it may currently be a monoculture but may become cross platform in the future). I just do not want to see us saying "you *must* encode your path in UTF-8 NFC".
Show 7 quoted lines
> ISO-8859-x file names may be fine if you won't ever need to: > - use git-web, JGit, gitk, git-gui... > - exchange repos with "normal" (UTF-8) Unices, Mac and Windows systems > - publish your work on a git hosting service (and expect file and > ref names to show up correctly in the web interface) > - store the repo on Unicode-based file systems (JFS, Joliet, UDF, > exFat, NTFS, HFS, CIFS...)
Yes, that is exatly what I said, isn't it? "Use whatever works for your project, we do not dictate."
> These restrictions are not that obvious when you start a new git > project,...
Or any project for that matter, not limited to "git project", no? Perhaps that is a moot point by now, as everything in the workd seems to be a "git project" these days.