Re: [PATCH/RFC] gitweb: Don't pass --full-history to git-log(1)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 5, 2015, 16:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqr3nh4qx5.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1438784487-9176-1-git-send-email-avarab@gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> When you look at the history for a file via "git log" we don't show > --full-history by default, but the Gitweb UI does so, which can be very > confusing for all the reasons discussed in "History Simplification" in > git-log(1) and in > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89400/focus=90659 > > We've been doing history via --full-history since pretty much forever, > but I think this is much more usable, and on a typical project with lots > of branches being merged it makes for a much less confusing view. We do > this for git log by default, why wouldn't Gitweb follow suit?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89400/focus=90758
seems to agree with you in principle that this would be what gitweb should do if it were written today.