Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2020, #05; Thu, 14)
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> This summary feels misleading; it's not simple rename + content merge,
> it's double rename + content merge. Perhaps:
>
> When a binary file gets modified and renamed on both sides of history
> to different locations, both files would be written to the working
> tree but both would have the contents from "ours". This has been
> corrected so that the path from each side gets their original content.