Re: [PATCH 1/4] t0080: mark as leak-free

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Jan 30, 2024, 20:00 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqr0hya8x3.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <20240130055333.GB166761@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> Setting the flag now just makes sure we continue correctly on that path,
> rather than getting surprised near the end of the road that t-basic has
> some dumb leak. Plus it avoids the script popping up as a false positive
> when checking for scripts which can be marked.

Alright. Any such "dumb leak" in the "basic" would hopefully be caught by the real t-$other unit tests exercised under the leak sanitizer, I hope, but it is not worth our time wondering if it makes sense to special case t0080 specifically.