Re: Keep original author with git merge --squash?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2015, 20:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpp9erihg.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150212092824.GA19626@peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 09:21:04AM -0800, David Glasser wrote: > >> (I'm not sure if this should be a flag to --squash or to commit. >> Maybe `git merge --squash`; `git commit --use-squashed-author`? Seems >> like it should be not too hard to implement; SQUASH_MSG is pretty >> parseable. Or just a config value.) > > It sounds like "git commit -c" is close to what you want, which will > pull the author and commit message from a particular commit. But I don't > think there is a convenient way to name the commit in your case (it is > likely to be the first commit on the branch you are squash-merging, but > there isn't a shorthand for that).
I thought David was primarily interested in the case where a branch authored by a single person, so specifying the tip of the branch being "merged" would be sufficient, no?