Re: Specifying N revisions after the initial commit
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 22, 2015, 19:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpp1a2pql.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+5PVA6YWJizRjseeJ4EpRya0Mpyrv3DoNsB3=Gi=dOiAoDfHg@mail.gmail.com>
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov > ... >> Hence, given any particular commit, you're able to trace all of its >> ancestry, but the reverse is not possible. > > That makes sense. I suppose I will have to resort to parsing output > of git-rev-list or something. Thanks for the reminder.
I think Konstantin explained why it fundamentally does not make sense to ask "which one is the Nth one after the root". I am not sure how running rev-list and count its output would help, unless you are now solving a different problem (perhaps "find all the ones that are Nth after some root", which does have an answer).