Re: [PATCH 2/2] style: do not "break" in switch() after "return"

> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Remove this unreachable code. It was found by SunCC, it's found by a
>> non-fatal warning emitted by SunCC. It's one of the things it's more
>> vehement about than GCC & Clang.
>
> This is a borderline Meh to me.
>
> I am even tempted to suggest that, unless all other case arms
> return, iow, if there is even a single arm that breaks, it may even
> be more future-proof to end any and all case arms that do not
> fall-thru to consistently end with break.
>
> If there is some way to fix the compiler, that may be preferrable,
> but as I said, this is borderline Meh and I do not care too deeply
> either way.
>
> Thanks.