Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] cocci: make "incremental" possible + a ccache-like tool
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 17, 2022, 19:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpmeqz2rn.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <221017.86czaqjnhy.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
> But as 10/11 notes we can just avoid this by not picking conflicting > names, which doesn't seem like an undue burden.
As long as it is clearly documented to make it well known to everybody who would attempt to touch or add .cocci files, I am OK with that direction.
> AFAICT we have 5 named rules, and seemingly only 1/4 actually needs its > name, the rest are apparently only using it for self-documentation, and > we could either remove the name, or accomplish the same with a comment:
Well, if they are for self-documentation, they'd better be unique, or they are not self-documenting enough, no ;-)?