Re: Request for adding a "clean" merge strategy for a double-commit merge to deal with conflicts separately
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 16, 2020, 17:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqo8ofgycz.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAD9n_qh0y84HC6sX1OxXWWv8dDMMA_tPv9zRknePVivQq_rfww@mail.gmail.com>
Alireza <rezaxm@gmail.com> writes:
> The proposal is that an option like `-X clean` would commit a clean > merge and leave out any conflicting hunks in the tree for a follow-up > commit to resolve conflicts.
You need to clarify what "leave out" means to you. If you and a side branch started from the same place and you did one thing while the side branch did something else, you would get a conflict.
What would the "clean" (by your definition) result have in that block of contents that actually has a conflict? Do you mean to say "Pick our version and ignore theirs in the blocks where the changes conflict"? If so perhaps -Xours merge strategy option that the recursive backend offers is what you are looking for?