Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2021, #03; Tue, 13)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 14, 2021, 22:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqo8b4tt05.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cQjyYGidKA3sNc6Xr3aw0mk_t-s_64qaX13ffv5R_CHLA@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:30 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes: >> > I think this series is ready and gave my Reviewed-by: here[1]. One of >> > the new tests contains an unnecessary but harmless `test -f`[2], but >> > it's such a minor nit that I doubt it's worth demanding a re-roll. >> >> I think having "test -f" is the right thing to do, so [2] is >> probably OK as-is. test_cmp may want to complain about a possible >> bug in the test when given a missing file. [...] > > We tried relatively recently to have test_cmp() complain about a > missing file[1], but both Ævar[2] and Peff[3] ran into problems in > which tests (presumably) legitimately called test_cmp() on missing > files, so the suggestion was made to revert the check[4], which is > indeed what happened[5].
Yes, I know all that, and even with that, having "test -f" is the right thing to do, so [2] is probably OK as-is.
Show 5 quoted lines
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200809174209.15466-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com/ > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200921104000.2304-15-avarab@gmail.com/ > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20201016001704.GA2937048@coredump.intra.peff.net/ > [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAPig+cSU=1GcQuqZab+0Vff_A-JmD59wEc3RMr3wDojpgRYUuw@mail.gmail.com/ > [5]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqv9f9ao0v.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com/