Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] cat-file: add mailmap subcommand to --batch-command
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2026, 19:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqo6k3ztxr.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <20260331121111.9614-2-siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> git-cat-file(1)'s --batch-command works with the --use-mailmap option, > but this option needs to be set when the process is created. This means > we cannot change this option mid-operation. > > At GitLab, Gitaly keeps interacting with a long-lived git-cat-file > process and it would be useful if --batch-command supported toggling > mailmap dynamically on an existing process. > > Add a `mailmap` subcommand to --batch-command that takes a boolean > argument. The command now uses `git_parse_maybe_bool()` and supports all > standard Git boolean values. Mailmap data is loaded lazily and kept in
I do not think you want to say "now uses `git_parse_maybe_bool()`". Nobody is interested in the difference relative to what you did in the previous iteration.
... that takes a boolean argument (usual ways you can specify a
boolean value like 'yes', 'true', etc., are supported).Show 7 quoted lines
> +static void load_mailmap(void)
> +{
> + if (mailmap.strdup_strings)
> + return;
> +
> + read_mailmap(the_repository, &mailmap);
> +}This, especially the early return condition, may deserve a bit of in-code comment, as "a used string_list has the .strdup_strings bit set" is not a generally applicable rule.
/*
* The mailmap is initialized with .strdup_strings set to 0,
* but read_mailmap() sets the bit to 1 (this is true even when
* not a single mailmap entry is read), so it can be used for
* lazy loading.
*/or something, perhaps?
Show 10 quoted lines
> @@ -692,6 +700,21 @@ static void parse_cmd_info(struct batch_options *opt,
> batch_one_object(line, output, opt, data);
> }
>
> +static void parse_cmd_mailmap(struct batch_options *opt UNUSED,
> + const char *line,
> + struct strbuf *output UNUSED,
> + struct expand_data *data UNUSED)
> +{
> + int value = git_parse_maybe_bool(line);As "line" is never NULL, one standard way to spell a boolean True is not available to the callers, namely, "mailmap<EOL>" (like how a configuration file entry "[core] bare" means "[core] bare = true"), but that is probably OK. "mailmap<SP><EOL>" may be interpreted as feeding an empty string as an argument, which is "false" to the git_parse_maybe_bool() function. That might be surprising.
Nothing actionable in the above comment (other than perhaps as a hint for documentation update).
Show 7 quoted lines
> + if (value < 0)
> + die(_("mailmap: invalid boolean '%s'"), line);
> +
> + if (value > 0)
> + load_mailmap();
> + use_mailmap = value;
> +}Hmph, why not use use_mailmap from the beginning of the function without introducing the local variable "value"? Nothing in load_mailmap() pays attention to the current value of use_mailmap so I do not see much point in preserving the current status until the last minute.
Thanks.