Re: [PATCH] builtin/reflog: say "would prune" for named refs with --dry-run

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> That will help prevent a similar bug from ever happening again, as
>> there would be only a single place that sets up how the expiration
>> is called, instead of two we currently have.
>
> Agreed, and I think the consolidation is doable.
>
> I suggest keeping this patch as it is, since it fixes the reported
> bug. I'll look into what you describe as a separate patch after this
> one, and the tests added here would stay useful for that patch too.