Re: [PATCH] commit.c:record_author_date() use skip_prefix() instead of starts_with()
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 3, 2014, 18:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmwh7qg6v.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <53144450.3080006@alum.mit.edu>
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> - if (!starts_with(buf, "author ")) {
>> + if (!skip_prefix(buf, "author ")) {
>
> If this is the only change, there is not much point, is there? How does
> this help? Perhaps there is some way to take advantage of the
> difference between starts_with() and skip_prefix() to simplify the rest
> of the function?I admit I lost track, but wasn't there a discussion to use starts_with/ends_with when appropriate (namely, the caller is absolutely not interested in what the remainder of the string is after skipping the prefix), moving away from skip_prefix()? Isn't this change going in the wrong direction?