Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] t3312-notes-empty: Test that 'git notes' removes empty notes by default
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 5, 2014, 19:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmw85o4lj.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1415176347-18694-2-git-send-email-johan@herland.net>
Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> writes:
Show 33 quoted lines
> Add test cases documenting the current behavior when trying to > add/append/edit empty notes. This is in preparation for adding > --allow-empty; to allow empty notes to be stored. > > Improved-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> > Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> > --- > t/t3312-notes-empty.sh | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 t/t3312-notes-empty.sh > > diff --git a/t/t3312-notes-empty.sh b/t/t3312-notes-empty.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000..44074f6 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/t/t3312-notes-empty.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > + > +test_description='Test adding/editing of empty notes' > +. ./test-lib.sh > + > +write_script fake_editor <<\EOF > + echo "$MSG" >"$1" > +EOF > +GIT_EDITOR=./fake_editor > +export GIT_EDITOR > + > +test_expect_success 'setup' ' > + test_commit one && > + git log -1 >expect_missing && > + empty_blob=$(git hash-object -w /dev/null) > +'
Show 6 quoted lines
> +cleanup_notes() {
> + git update-ref -d refs/notes/commits
> +}
> +
> +verify_missing() {
> + git log -1 > actual &&Hmph, it was unclear what exactly you are trying to check with this one and the other "git log -1 >expect_missing".
Perhaps a comment that says "We are interested in the trailing 'Notes: ...' in the output" is necessary here, or (probably even better) use the --format='%N' to make it crystal clear?
> + test_cmp expect_missing actual && > + ! git notes list HEAD
Isn't this test_must_fail (i.e. if somebody screws up to make "git notes list" segfault, the test should fail, not taking the dying with SEGV as a sign of success)?
Show 21 quoted lines
> +} > + > +for cmd in \ > + 'add' \ > + 'add -F /dev/null' \ > + 'add -m ""' \ > + 'add -c "$empty_blob"' \ > + 'add -C "$empty_blob"' \ > + 'append' \ > + 'append -F /dev/null' \ > + 'append -m ""' \ > + 'append -c "$empty_blob"' \ > + 'append -C "$empty_blob"' \ > + 'edit' > +do > + test_expect_success "'git notes $cmd' removes empty note" " > + cleanup_notes && > + MSG= git notes $cmd && > + verify_missing > + " > +done
Perhaps just a taste issue, but I would think
while read cmd
do
... that test eval with $cmd interpolation ...
done <<-\EOF
add
add -F /dev/null
...
EOFwould be easier to maintain and to read, without having to worry about quoting and backslashing.
> + > +test_done