Re: Advice on edits to git-rebase man page
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2015, 21:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmw4sjbcm.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpq1tm412dk.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > >> Perhaps something like this instead? >> >> git-rebase - Rebuild a branch on top of a different commit > > I would say "Replay history on top of a different commit" instead. > "Rebuild" may be misleading (it's not "build" as in "compile & link"), > and the rebased history does not technically have to be a branch.
I am fine if the description were "replay history and repoint the branch tip to the result"; the fact that branch tip moves is an important part of the semantics of the command.
Otherwise, you cannot cleanly capture why we have rebase and cherry-pick (which can do ranges these days).