Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Many promisor remotes
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 15, 2019, 09:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmukrr52m.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190409161116.30256-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> This patch series is based on: > > 763fb763b8 (Merge branch 'jt/batch-fetch-blobs-in-diff' into jch, 2019-04-08) > > to avoid issues with jt/batch-fetch-blobs-in-diff.
Yuck. As an experienced contributor, you should know better than that by now to do that. A merge into jch/pu are rebuilt at least once and often three times a day, and in no way a good solid base to build on top.
If you really need to depend on another topic or two, please base your work on a merge between 'master' (or some well known ancestor of it) and the tips of the topics instead.
Having said that, I thought that the semantic conflict has been corrected and the machinery to rebuild 'pu' has been replaying the correct resolution ever since, so there was no need for such a rebase? Isn't it the case and do we still have the breakage due to semantic conflict with JTan's topic in 'pu'?