Re: format-patch: "magic" mbox timestamp
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 10, 2020, 23:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmtzo6c0d.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAETBDP6d8UwiJEF_pX0p=xLG79pwHeEtectmOnjPiUpjUCPaqw@mail.gmail.com>
Brandon Richardson <brandon1024.br@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm assuming the "UNIX mailbox > format" referenced in the docs refers to the mbox database format > described in appendix A of RFC-4155. If so, since we use a commit id > in place of the sender email address, would that itself be sufficient > to indicate that the output isn't from a real mailbox? A commit id > will never match the addr-spec in RFC-2822, so I figure that anyone > looking at `format-patch` output could safely assume that it did not > originate from a mailbox.
I vaguely recall that it was possible for the "From" line that begins each message in a UNIX mbox had a local sender without "@", so it would be a bit wider than addr-spec and a string of raw hexadecimal digits would not sufficiently "strange" enough to serve as a "magic" identifier.