Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2025, #01; Mon, 7)

> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 04:49:28PM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> * pb/perf-test-fixes (2025-03-28) 2 commits
>>  - p9210: fix 'scalar clone' when running from a detached HEAD
>>  - p7821: fix test_perf invocation for prereqs
>> 
>>  "make perf" fixes.
>> 
>>  Will merge to 'next'?
>>  cf. <Z-pD1puYT87YKAd4@pks.im>
>>  source: <pull.1936.git.git.1743181669.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
>
> I had one question around empty prereqs introduced by the patch that
> wasn't yet answered. Based on my testing empty prereqs do work just fine
> though and evaluate to true, so the patch series looks fine to me.
>
>> * ps/misc-build-fixes (2025-04-01) 5 commits
>>  - ci: use Visual Studio for win+meson job on GitHub Workflows
>>  - meson: distinguish build and target host binaries
>>  - meson: respect 'tests' build option in contrib
>>  - gitweb: fix generation of "gitweb.js"
>>  - meson: fix handling of '-Dcurl=auto'
>> 
>>  Random build fixes.
>> 
>>  Will merge to 'next'?
>>  cf. <CAOLa=ZQ8bTn-prAs2ycLdLLjVaLQL4GtLw_gFsvAcx_6j=MBjA@mail.gmail.com>
>>  source: <20250331-b4-pks-collect-build-fixes-v2-0-6b06136808f3@pks.im>
>
> I think this one should be ready to be merged.
>
>> * ab/pathspec-sign-compare-workaround (2025-04-01) 1 commit
>>  - pathspec: fix sign comparison warnings
>> 
>>  Some warnings from "-Wsign-compare" for pathspec.c have been
>>  squelched.
>>  
>>  Will merge to 'next'?
>>  source: <127c3010-4b23-436e-a07d-e6031e746113@gmail.com>
>
> I had another read just now, the patch looks good to me.
>
>> * jt/rev-list-z (2025-03-21) 5 commits
>>  - rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option
>>  - rev-list: support NUL-delimited --boundary option
>>  - rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes
>>  - rev-list: refactor early option parsing
>>  - rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()`
>> 
>>  "git rev-list" learns machine-parsable output format that delimits
>>  each field with NUL.
>> 
>>  Will merge to 'next'?
>>  source: <20250319183410.1225428-1-jltobler@gmail.com>
>
> Same here, I did scan through the series again and didn't notice
> anything objectionable.
>
>> * sk/clar-trailer-urlmatch-norm-test (2025-03-04) 2 commits
>>  - t/unit-tests: convert urlmatch-normalization test to clar
>>  - t/unit-tests: convert trailer test to use clar
>> 
>>  A few traditional unit tests have been rewritten to use the clar
>>  framework.
>> 
>>  Will merge to 'next'?
>>  cf. <xmqqzfi0pthr.fsf@gitster.g>
>>  source: <20250304113323.10564-1-kuforiji98@gmail.com>
>
> Yup. I didn't review this on-list, but already reviewed it internally
> before Seyi sent it to the mailing list.
>
> Patrick