Re: [PATCH v16 6/6] bisect--helper: `is_expected_rev` & `check_expected_revs` shell function in C
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 20, 2017, 03:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqlgj1myyj.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAP8UFD3SYU_+MOT-TGCV4uJ-cxrd9VhgOOprkq-XP0CUhtGTig@mail.gmail.com>
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> wrote: >> Reimplement `is_expected_rev` & `check_expected_revs` shell function in >> C and add a `--check-expected-revs` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to >> call it from git-bisect.sh . > > It looks like this patch forgot to add the `--check-expected-revs` > subcommand to the usage string.
Usage string of what? "git bisect"?
I do not think bisect--helper even needs to have end-user facing "usage string", but "git bisect--helper -h" still gets the new thing listed in its output for free thanks to parse-options API, so that is not what you found "this patch forgot to add" and you are making me scratch my head.