Re: [PATCH v3] rebase: clarify conditionals in todo_list_to_strbuf()
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 10, 2023, 16:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqleeihok5.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <ZNTTTAtNE2/DY9vT@ugly>
Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 12:39:37PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>Thanks. Then this patch is still a strict "Meh" to me. >> > i can't really think of a reason why you reject such a no-brainer > other than that you consider it churn. in that case i need to tell you > that you have unreasonable standards, which actively contribute to the > code remaining a mess.
An ad-hominem remark is a signal that it is good time to disengage.
There are certain style differences that may be acceptable if it were written from the get-go, but it is not worth the patch churn to switch once it is in the tree. This one squarely falls into that category.
Bye.