Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Improve git-pull test coverage

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: May 29, 2015, 18:08 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqk2vrcl4l.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <1432899885-25143-1-git-send-email-pyokagan@gmail.com>

Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> writes:

Show 23 quoted lines

> This is a re-roll of [1].
>
> This patch series improves test coverage of git-pull.sh, and is part of my
> GSoC project to rewrite git-pull into a builtin. Improving test coverage
> helps to prevent regressions that could occur due to the rewrite.
>
> Thanks Junio, Johannes and Stefan for the reviews last round.
>
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/269236
>
> Paul Tan (8):
>   t5520: prevent field splitting in content comparisons
>   t5520: test no merge candidates cases
>   t5520: test for failure if index has unresolved entries
>   t5520: test work tree fast-forward when fetch updates head
>   t5520: test --rebase with multiple branches
>   t5520: test --rebase failure on unborn branch with index
>   t5521: test --dry-run does not make any changes
>   t5520: check reflog action in fast-forward merge
>
>  t/t5520-pull.sh         | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  t/t5521-pull-options.sh |  13 ++++
>  2 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

I saw very little changes relative to the previous round, and all of them looked sensible ones.

Thanks.