Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] Submodule object path
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 14, 2015, 18:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqk2rsx404.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150913223256.GB8042@wheezy.local>
Max Kirillov <max@max630.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 06:10:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> When I push the updated 'pu' out, could you please check > > I follow the pu merges. So far resolutions seem correct and > all tests pass.
The primary thing I ask from "eyeballing by the original author" is to see if "git diff M^ M" for the merge M of the topic is something the original author would have done if he was given a starting point of M^ to build his or her topic (which is what your "resolutions seem correct" really is), so we are good.
> If you don't mind re-resolving it as I send newer versions I will > base them on master.
So far rerere seems to be happy, so basing on the same commit is fine, but I suspect this round should already be ready for 'next'.
I had to remove the now-unused variable "const char *git_dir;" in [PATCH 1/2], but other than that it looked OK from a cursory re-read.
Thanks.